We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

State Pension (rip off)

1235»

Comments

  • le_loup
    le_loup Posts: 4,047 Forumite
    Erm ... my comment was about the use of the word TIMES when D meant YEARS.
    Read first, comment second.
  • le_loup wrote: »
    Erm ... my comment was about the use of the word TIMES when D meant YEARS.
    Read first, comment second.

    Cheeky!

    What makes you think he meant years? I read it as correct myself.
    :j Trytryagain FLYLADY - SAYE £700 each month Premium Bonds £713 Mortgage Was £100,000@20/6/08 now zilch 21/4/15:beer: WTL - 52 (I'll do it 4 MUM)
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,185 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Erm ... my comment was about the use of the word TIMES when D meant YEARS.

    No, I meant times. Life expectancy after retirement is generally recorded as being just 2 years on average when it was introduced. It is now closer to 20 years with expectation that it will move to 30 years.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • le_loup
    le_loup Posts: 4,047 Forumite
    In that case, I grovingly apologise to all.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    annie1975 wrote: »
    A state pension should be enough to live on after paying tax and insurance all your life?
    It's supposed to be enough to avoid abject poverty and is only around four tenths of pensioner incomes overall. But most people will appreciate a higher living standard than provided by the state pensions. The way to get that is to exercise choice and pay into other pensions or invest for retirement in some other effective way.

    Here are some official statistics about pensioner income for 2010-11 that you might find interesting:
    • In 2010-11 the average net income for all pensioner units (pensioner couples and single pensioners together) was £340 after housing costs (£369 per week before housing costs).
    • Between 1998-99 and 2010-11, average net income after housing costs increased by 40 per cent. Before housing costs the rise was 33 per cent.
    • Average pensioners' income has grown faster between 1998-99 and 2010-11 than average earnings, which increased by 11 per cent during the same period.
    • In 2010-11 state benefits accounted for 43 per cent of pensioners’ incomes, occupational pensions made up 26 per cent, earnings 20 per cent, investment income 7 per cent, and personal pensions 4 per cent.
    • Single male pensioners had an average net income After Housing Costs of £257 per week in 2010-11 compared with £211 for single female pensioners (the basic state pension that year was £97.65 for a single pensioner).

    That £369 a week is around £19,100 a year. Way more than the state pensions provide. For that report, pensioners means only people above state pension age, or a couple with one above. About three quarters of pensioners own their own homes.

    You might also find it interesting that "The median net income has grown faster than the mean net income for both Before Housing Costs and After Housing Costs, with the Before Housing Costs median increasing 39 per cent between 1998-99 and 2010-11 and 48 per cent After Housing Costs. This means pensioners in the middle of the income distribution have seen faster growth than those in the upper end of the distribution", so it's not an increase just due to rich retirees getting richer but really is the average pensioners doing better.
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    A close friend of mine never made it past his 39th birthday. So he'll never receive a penny of what he paid in.

    Neither did my daughter, who died 10 years ago this month, aged 39.

    Nor did her Dad, my first husband, who didn't even make it to his 60th.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Nor my father.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.