We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Santander ppi rejection because claim is time barred
Options
Comments
-
That's so bad! A few others on here have said they never received the letters either, so we have to take there word for it! It's so bad anything to get out of not paying up!0
-
Yumma_mama wrote: »That's so bad! A few others on here have said they never received the letters either, so we have to take there word for it! It's so bad anything to get out of not paying up!
The point is that is that, whilst some post may not get through, the vast majority does. So if they can persuade FOS it was sent - and to the correct address - then FOS will conclude that it is more likely than not that it was received.0 -
their is no time barred on ppi reclaims
it is when you became aware of the misselling that counts
if the ppi repayments are current then they are talking crap anyway
statute of limitations from six years since cause of action, or last time payment was made, not from inception of the ppi policyAs for the matter of the Limitation Act 1980, the company seems either deliberately or negligently to have overlooked the provisions of section 32 whereby :
the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.
Hence, the claim is not necessarily statute barred as Santander have averred.
Reply With QuoteNope.
Your complaint is over before it's begun....0 -
Oh right so I could have a chance then? :-)0
-
I've complained to the FOS - I'm not holding my breath, but I think it's damn right disgraceful Alliance and Leicester/Santander are getting away with this, and other banks are tipping up the cash to their customers!0
-
Oh right so I could have a chance then? :-)
Not if it has been timebarred correctly.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
But I was paying back the loan until 2011 and if they so called sent these letters in 2009 about time barring etc why didn't they stop my ppi payments aswel?! As I was paying ppi until 2011. So surely they've contradicted themselves and was still happy to take the ppi payments even though they suposably sent these letters :-/0
-
Yumma_mama wrote: »Oh right so I could have a chance then? :-)
No. That's the trouble with posters who find a little bit of law and hang around a forum of nitwits [not this forum] they think it applies to everyone but all it does is give people false hope.
If they've already written to you to tell you it's timebarred, then they will tell the FOS the same thing if you go to them.
By all means try it, but don't hold out any hope.Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi0 -
their is no time barred on ppi reclaimsit is when you became aware of the misselling that countsstatute of limitations from six years since cause of action, or last time payment was made, not from inception of the ppi policy
Presumably by this, you mean the Limitation Act 1980.
However, FOS will look at the DISP rules of the Financial Conduct Authority NOT the Limitation Act.The period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.
For the reason I have just given, this will not help with a case taken to FOS.
In theory you could attempt to take the matter to court but the even when no time bar applies, the courts are finding in favour of respondents - i.e. that in law no wrongdoing has taken place.
In any event, the letter sent by Santander would be accepted by the court as evidence of knowledge and thus set the time limit running.if the ppi repayments are current then they are talking crap anyway
So, I am afraid that they seem to be correct in their interpretation.
Therefore, I agree with -taff. By all means try FOS but don't hold your breath.
And remember that a court presents considerable risk and the track record for PPI complainants is not good.0 -
Yumma_mama wrote: »But I was paying back the loan until 2011 and if they so called sent these letters in 2009 about time barring etc why didn't they stop my ppi payments aswel?! As I was paying ppi until 2011. So surely they've contradicted themselves and was still happy to take the ppi payments even though they suposably sent these letters :-/
So you were still paying the PPI premiums until 2011 and Santander say
you are time barred under the Limitation Act 1980 ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards