Northern rock loan over £25,000

Bignosher13

Brought forward by a couple of days.

I suspect the result to be post election somehow.

Not long now everyone ….

Case
Reference: A3/2015/0150

Title: NRAM Plc v McAdam & Anr

Type: Appeal

Appeal / Application:
from the order of Mr Justice Burton
High Court QBD Commercial Court dated 10-Dec-14
Hearing Status: Float on 27-Apr-15 or 28-Apr-15 estimated length (in hours): 10:00

Venue: London

Constitution:
Not assigned
Not assigned
Not assigned

Case results:
Track Your Case:
Current Status: Awaiting a hearing - see Hearing Status

Tracking Information:
20-Feb-15: Case passed to List Office
18-Feb-15: Letter sent to applicant/solicitor to request bundles and/or documents
17-Feb-15: Application allowed on paper by Lord/Lady Justice
06-Feb-15: Application referred to Lord/Lady Justice
22-Jan-15: Bundle(s) approved


Last Updated: 31-Mar-15

stusimpson

Can anyone enlighten me as to why the 2009 date is relevant ?

My Together mortgage which i redeemed last year was from 2007?, surely the redress goes back to then. Or has it something to do with only going back 6 years?

Well done to all the folks on here who have been fighting hard for years.

Cheers Stu

stusimpson

Aha just read back a few pages, all understood!

keg1keg

Has any one else received a letter `planning you future` discusses interest rates and encouraging us to look for a better deal elsewhere ! Obviously, no other lender will consider us ! Anyone ?

tonyh66

keg1keg wrote: »

Has any one else received a letter `planning you future` discusses interest rates and encouraging us to look for a better deal elsewhere ! Obviously, no other lender will consider us ! Anyone ?

Yes, I'm looking to re-mortgage this year, eventually got enough equity in the property to cover paying off the loan part and reducing monthly payments and the length of time I will be paying it. Hopefully this will come good for all of us and the interest repayment can go to a better LTV for me.

NorthernRockVictim

Yep, they're trying to get rid of us as we're considered to be high risk when evaluating borrowers in today's market place.

Please consider this - IF they lose then every month that goes by is costing them 8.5% per annum statutory compound interest until they settle. You won't get that return anywhere else, so keeping the loan alive may be a wise investment choice.

Seven_of_Nine

Dear All,

The justice Web page now names the residing judges:-Case
Reference: A3/2015/0150
Title: NRAM Plc v McAdam & Anr
Type: Appeal
Appeal / Application:
from the order of Mr Justice Burton
High Court QBD Commercial Court dated 10-Dec-14
Hearing Status: Float on 27-Apr-15 or 28-Apr-15 estimated length (in hours): 10:00
Venue: London
Constitution:
THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS
LORD JUSTICE RICHARDS
LADY JUSTICE BLACK
Case results:
Track Your Case:
Current Status: Awaiting a hearing - see Hearing Status
Tracking Information:
20-Feb-15: Case passed to List Office
18-Feb-15: Letter sent to applicant/solicitor to request bundles and/or documents
17-Feb-15: Application allowed on paper by Lord/Lady Justice
06-Feb-15: Application referred to Lord/Lady Justice
22-Jan-15: Bundle(s) approved


Last Updated: 13-Apr-15

Fingers crossed!

jimbo5661

I hope I'm wrong, but I don't hold out too much hope for a positive outcome... NRAM seem very good at wriggling out of their responsibilities.

Or... It was just a stall until after the election and then they'll present a weak argument and be made to pay up!

lizards

I feel the same way Jimbo. I was amazed they lost the first time around. It would be great to be wrong about this!

keg1keg

I don't see why under 25k would be entitled to redress but over 25 wouldn't !! Is there some differences ?
Positive thinking guys c'mon !