Northern rock loan over £25,000

fraaaaanka

claret_mike wrote: »

My understanding of what has gone on would believe me to the fact that it is mis-representation of contract rather than mis-selling.

Ok Claret_Mike, I got ya and yes I agree that perhaps it would be viewed as mis-representation rather than mis-selling... but my opinion on outcome is the same regardless

Dave-80

I see they updated the case today. Hearing between june and october this year!

Case Tracker for Civil Appeals
Summary Case Details for 20150150
Case
Reference: A3/2015/0150
Title: NRAM Plc v McAdam & Anr
Type: Appeal
Appeal / Application:
from the order of Mr Justice Burton
High Court QBD Commercial Court dated 10-Dec-14
Hearing Status: Window of 15-Jun-15 to 14-Oct-15 estimated length (in hours): 10:00
Venue: London
Constitution:
Not assigned
Not assigned
Not assigned
Case results:
Track Your Case:
Current Status: Awaiting bundles and/or documents from applicant/applicant''s solicitors
Tracking Information:
18-Feb-15: Letter sent to applicant/solicitor to request bundles and/or documents
17-Feb-15: Application allowed on paper by Lord/Lady Justice
06-Feb-15: Application referred to Lord/Lady Justice
22-Jan-15: Bundle(s) approved



Last Updated: 18-Feb-15
Search again
About Justice Directgov Your privacy © Crown copyright
Link to Justice UK homepage

NorthernRockVictim

Dave-80 wrote: »

Hearing Status: Window of 15-Jun-15 to 14-Oct-15 estimated length (in hours): 10:00

Outrageous timescale - Now I truly believe this is politics and corruption in the lowest form. This timescale ensures that the General Election will be in the past and the incoming party will inherit the problem.

Our Queen got involved with Scottish referendum, heads of parties dashed North to stop a yes vote, one wonders what really goes on within the boardroom of UK PLC.

jimbo5661

So, let me get this straight. They've been given leave to appeal and will do so between June & October of this year?

On the plus side, it isn't the 18months that was quoted as a possibility!

I fear that NRAM will win and we'll be left back at square one, with no redress...

NorthernRockVictim

jimbo5661 wrote: »

So, let me get this straight. They've been given leave to appeal and will do so between June & October of this year?

On the plus side, it isn't the 18months that was quoted as a possibility!

I fear that NRAM will win and we'll be left back at square one, with no redress...

Ah, may be I mis-read it Jim: "Appeal / Application:" I took as being the trial which will decide upon their right to be granted Leave to Appeal.

Anyone know whether this is the actual Appeal trial or the request to Appeal?

jimbo5661

I'm not sure to be honest!

NorthernRockVictim

They have been granted leave to appeal, but allegedly still considering whether to: http://www.n-ram.co.uk/loans/loans-over-25000

NorthernRockVictim

Does anyone here have enough legal knowledge to explain the implications of being granted leave to appeal? Does it mean that there is a valid point(s) of law for assessment, or is it merely granted in the interest of fair justice?

keg1keg

I found this on Yahoo Q&A. Not sure if it's helpful !

Leave to Appeal is simply 'permission to appeal' to a higher judicial authority

It can be granted by the lower court (say the county court) to the Court of Appeal; or from the district judge to the circuit judge.

If permission is not granted by the lower court, you can apply for permission (leave) directly to the higher court which may then hear the appeal.

The test for permission is "does the appeal have reasonable prospects of success". Unsurprisingly it is difficult to get permission from the lower court, whose decision you are challenging.

NorthernRockVictim

keg1keg wrote: »

The test for permission is "does the appeal have reasonable prospects of success

UGGH - They've got something up their ugly legal sleeves.

Something thar irritates me immensely is their comment that we have not been financially compromised, errm did that not apply to the <25k fraternity?