We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
New owners wont hand over post!
Comments
-
You try to help and show the law, and perhaps suggest by implication that they are in a very weak position, and the snipers snipe.
You're welcome, good luck to the OP, at least I tried.:cool:Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold"; if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn0 -
They are not in a weak position at all (and if you are going to threaten people with law then its best you are well versed on it else it can be construed as threatening behaviour, harrassment or blackmail), your grasp of the law is what is weak in this case.
If the mail is delievered to the address then unless intent to act to a persons detriment can be proved (good luck in that, unless its a spiteful ex and you have a recorded history of them intending to do so) then there is no violation of this law.
People aren't sniping, they are just giving the OP the true facts of what can be achieved.0 -
propertyman wrote: »You try to help and show the law, and perhaps suggest by implication that they are in a very weak position, and the snipers snipe.
You're welcome, good luck to the OP, at least I tried.:cool:
Is that what you did?
Is that why you suggested threatening them with the Police,to show their weak position? :rotfl:0 -
Have you still got a spare key?0
-
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards