We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fired for faking sick day?
Options
Comments
-
InsideInsurance wrote: »Employers dont mind someone whos had 2 occasions of sickness and a total of 8 days (using the normal method it scores 32 points) but having say 7 occurrences totaling 8 days is going to look very suspicious (392 points). Of cause it could be true but then they really should look into why they keep getting sick so much and what can be done to avoid it.
I used to work for NHS Direct - 2 instances of sick leave within one rolling year put you on a disciplinary and another instance within one rolling year of the disciplinary put you on a stage 2 disciplinary, one more time within one rolling year of the stage 2 and you could be sacked. In theory (and worse case scenario) if you were sent home ill three times and so had had three half days off sick in just under 3 years then you could be sacked.
Not good for moral and shows poor management imo - within 6 months of the rules coming in about 30% of the staff were on stage 1 disciplinaries some with less than 3 days sick - about the time it takes to recover from a nasty cold!!
That said, taking a sick day without being sick should be a disciplinary but managers should investigate first ie manage the situation by talking to the person first, so I fancied a day off - not so good. I broke my arm and can't use the computers but can still go out - no problem as far as I'm concerned.0 -
Back in the 1980's I knew someone who worked in the public sector who had discovered that every employee had 6 weeks of sick leave 'allowed for' in the cost of their contracts. This was on top of 30 days annual leave plus bank holidays. So he took those 6 weeks, spread throughout the year, whether he needed them or not, on the basis (as he said) that they had already been "accounted for" so the company wasn't "loosing out".
As far as I know to this day he still has the same mentality and hardly ever goes to work if he can help it but still expects to be paid.
Some people just think the world owes them a living. Or they are just gobsh*tes. You pick.£2 Savers Club 2016 #21 £14/£250
£2 Savers Club 2015 #8 £250£200 :j
Proud to be an OU graduate :j :j
Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass but learning to dance in the rain0 -
Hezzawithkids wrote: »Back in the 1980's I knew someone who worked in the public sector who had discovered that every employee had 6 weeks of sick leave 'allowed for' in the cost of their contracts. This was on top of 30 days annual leave plus bank holidays. So he took those 6 weeks, spread throughout the year, whether he needed them or not, on the basis (as he said) that they had already been "accounted for" so the company wasn't "loosing out"..
6 WEEKS? Are you sure its not 6 days?
Certainly when you do capacity planning you have to take into account that on average about 2% of staff will be off sick on any one day. Its easy to do when you have a large multi site call centre operation with thousands of agents but harder when its a small 10 seat single site place as flu or food poisoning etc can easily take a number of them out at once.
Would be surprised if any company works on the basis that at any time 12.5% of staff will be off sick at any one time.0 -
Hezzawithkids wrote: »Back in the 1980's I knew someone who worked in the public sector who had discovered that every employee had 6 weeks of sick leave 'allowed for' in the cost of their contracts. This was on top of 30 days annual leave plus bank holidays. So he took those 6 weeks, spread throughout the year, whether he needed them or not, on the basis (as he said) that they had already been "accounted for" so the company wasn't "loosing out".
As far as I know to this day he still has the same mentality and hardly ever goes to work if he can help it but still expects to be paid.
Some people just think the world owes them a living. Or they are just gobsh*tes. You pick.
Was very common, many public sector workers just treated the "allowed" sick days as paid holiday and made sure they took them all every year. With a bit of luck, things seem to be changing.0 -
InsideInsurance wrote: »6 WEEKS? Are you sure its not 6 days?
Certainly when you do capacity planning you have to take into account that on average about 2% of staff will be off sick on any one day. Its easy to do when you have a large multi site call centre operation with thousands of agents but harder when its a small 10 seat single site place as flu or food poisoning etc can easily take a number of them out at once.
Would be surprised if any company works on the basis that at any time 12.5% of staff will be off sick at any one time.
Just did a quick google and it appears that the met police (staff not officers) figure is around 10%.0 -
I worked at a place where once a quarter a few of them would sit down to work out a 'rota' for who could take 'sick' leave when - so they weren't all off together and didn't exceed the two in a thirteen week rolling period. They had a calendar with different coloured highlighter pens for each person!0
-
We use the bradford score (occasions x occasions) x days. No more than 124 in 1 year.0
-
To many employers, being ill is a punishable offence, let alone faking it! My son has to attend a 'back to work' interview after even one day of sick leave. He is warned every day goes on his record and will have to attend a disciplinary interview to explain his 'poor attendance' if he is I'll again. He has had about 8 days of this year with genuine bugs and sinus infections, but will have to be at death's door before he dares take any more sick leave.
A friend was recovering from a change of medication for a heart condition was told by his GP that he couldn't work but had to take regular exercise for 2 weeks. He was reported by a colleague as he was seen out having a coffee in town and his managers visited him at home and told him he must be housebound if he was certified off sick! They said it set a bad example if he was out and about and his exercise should be confined to walking up and down stairs and strolling around the garden.
If a Dr has signed someone off sick, but has stated that that person needs to exercise, the employer is in no position to dictate what that exercise should be. It's about time employers butted out when proper medical advice has already been sought.[SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
[/SIZE]0 -
Paid sick leave? oh I wish.whoever said laughter was the best medicine has clearly never tasted wine
Stopped smoking 20:30 28/09/110
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards