mortgage application disclosure

Conrad

Potatoebloke you remind me of the way conspiracy theorists think. They see menance where none exists. They see 'facts proving skull duggery' when others see perfectly sensible alternate explanations.

There is no getting though to such a mind.

potatoefeet66

Conrad wrote: »

Potatoebloke you remind me of the way conspiracy theorists think. They see menance where none exists. They see 'facts proving skull duggery' when others see perfectly sensible alternate explanations.

There is no getting though to such a mind.

So wheres the conspiracy theory in fact that the lender won't or can't provide me FOS or ICO with any disclosure documents for any application?

potatoefeet66

Id like to take this opportunity to thank andy for getting me to page ten cheers..... keep up the good work the more publicity this gets will result in either lender having no option in taking me to court over allegations of fraud saving me a fortune or explaining its action and apologising or case becoming public knowledge protecting future or existing customers from sharp practice of this company..... until next time

_Andy_

I'd like to say I think I was pivotal in getting to page #10. Admittedly we have some work to do to get to, say, 15, but with the consistent approach the OP has I'm sure we can do it. Cheers

mrginge

There's no 'e' in potato.

potatoefeet66

mrginge wrote: »

There's no 'e' in potato.

think about it very sloooowly,,,,,, potatoe...... what u got on your feet clever boy .....

mrginge

potatoefeet66 wrote: »

think about it very sloooowly,,,,,, potatoe...... what u got on your feet clever boy .....

Erm....socks?

jumpedtheshark

Gave up on page 6. Just wanted to post and thank JimmyTheWig for getting all of the details out so that this made at least some sense. You, Sir, have the patience of a saint.

potatoefeet66

jumpedtheshark wrote: »

Gave up on page 6. Just wanted to post and thank JimmyTheWig for getting all of the details out so that this made at least some sense. You, Sir, have the patience of a saint.

So as much as Lance Armstrong did not get caught doping in any of the tour races that fact must mean that all his victories must stand.
refer back to my issue, that fact that a lender says falsely states that a mortgage application was conducted assessed on one day when it actually took place on a completely different day means that it is exempt from being challenged, and they cannot provide legal documents supporting there claim...... your all fools

Dave_Ham

Losing credibility fast...

Still nearly 200 posts...