We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Why doesn't Cameron want Scottish Independence?
Comments
-
The SNP have an overwhelming majority of 1 seat at the moment.
There are some really obvious reasons for their electoral success:
The Tories in Scotland are unelectable.
People are fed up of Labour after the Blair years, and all the big-hitting Scottish Labour politicians are in Westminster for some reason.
The SNP don't actually do anything, apart from give out a few 'freebies' of questionable affordability. It's easy to be a party of government when all you have to do is spend money while other people collect the taxes.
Labour, Tories LibDems? Oh yes it's all of them plus the Greens. SSP and independents too! In a system set up to avoid majorities at all costs! And polls show they'd do even better now!
Ah well, no wonder Cameron rarely meets Salmond. He probably can't resist asking what it must feel like to win an election.:DThere is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
The Spanish (and other) fishermen own the rights to fish in Scottish waters having bought the rights. Scotland would not be able to take back those rights under EU law. I guess they could send the military in to enforce what they see as their rights but I wouldn't fancy their chances against the Spanish.
The UK would have to hand the relative payment to Scotland.
It's no big deal.0 -
The UK would have to hand the relative payment to Scotland.
It's no big deal.There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
-
Westminster parties do, right enough. Will the power-hungry find Holyrood big enough? I'm betting not and that's why they're getting the better quality politicos. The scum's rising to London.
It clearly hasn't mattered whether they did that or not.
Spain better hope Scotland doesn't resell their fishing rights to somebody bigger !
By better quality do you mean lying self interested egotistical idiots? I can't see why anyone would believe the SNP are any better quality than any other party, frankly. There doesn't seem to be much evidence to support that view.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »By better quality do you mean lying self interested egotistical idiots? I can't see why anyone would believe the SNP are any better quality than any other party, frankly. There doesn't seem to be much evidence to support that view.
If only Cameron, Clegg or Brown could have won an election - but none of them did!:DThere is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
I'd be worried for the Spanish in case they haven't kept their receipt; they'd need it when they go back to London for any refunds:beer:
The Spanish fisherman who own rights to fish in British waters bought those rights from British fishermen in private transactions so there's no refund for anyone and their fishing rights would be unaffected should Scotland become independent.0 -
The voters seem to think very differently about that!
If only Cameron, Clegg or Brown could have won an election - but none of them did!:D
Why does the fact that people voted for a party suggest that party's politicans are better quality?
When I vote, I vote for the party which best represents my interests (the Monster Raving Loony party). I wouldn't vote for a party which had policies that I disagreed with just because it had more competent people. That would be a really strange thing to do!0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »Why does the fact that people voted for a party suggest that party's politicans are better quality?
When I vote, I vote for the party which best represents my interests (the Monster Raving Loony party). I wouldn't vote for a party which had policies that I disagreed with just because it had more competent people. That would be a really strange thing to do!
It's just turning into a confusing coontest of choosing the administrators of these identical policies and its obviously getting hard to identify whop's the best/leastt competent.:(There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
All the parties here in England seem to offer identikit policies generally based on mimicing the US e.g taking on huge personal debt to reduce attractivenesss of collective bargaining, shrinking the state etc.
Indeed - Ireland also followed the same track as well with pretty poor results. Thankfully the SNP have always distanced themselves from that approach, not for example referring to that country as being part of an "arc of prosperity" with an independent Scotland.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards