We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
"independent" appeals service, post Oct 2012
Comments
-
Forgotten how.Coupon-mad wrote: »Title needs to say Oct 2012!
I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0 -
peter_the_piper wrote: »Forgotten how.
Edit, go advanced!0 -
Thanks , done.
Suggest you all read this before finalising plans. http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=72105&pid=720951&st=0&#entry720951I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0 -
On putting "BPA" and "keeper liability" into Google I stumbled upon this interesting document from London Councils:
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/London%20Councils/Item20.POPLAReport140612.doc
As this document appears to be publicly available under the Web, following a simple search, and there appears to be no claim of confidentiality attached or any attempt made to secure it, I am naturally assuming that is a public domain document.
Anyway it is an interesting read. Apparently they are expecting only 1% to appeal!!! 1%!!! I think they may have to revise that upwards a bit to say the least.0 -
Very interesting, have you posted this on pepipoo, they would be appreciate it.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
Not on Pepipoo I'm afraid but if anyone wants to do the honours.0
-
Done..........I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
Going to be watching this thread with great interest.
Good work MSE peeps, your work is appreciated0 -
ripped_off_driver wrote: »On putting "BPA" and "keeper liability" into Google I stumbled upon this interesting document from London Councils:
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/London%20Councils/Item20.POPLAReport140612.doc
So now Local Government officials, as well as the MoJ, DfT and DVLA, have all failed to notice the extremely large elephant in the room.
You can only "appeal" against something that is lawful in the first place.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
From that document -Equalities Implications for London Councils
There are no equalities implications
Oh boy - I don't think they've thought this through!
Another thought - once this strange beast is up and running will they obliged to respond to FOI requests, being a de facto public authority?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards