We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
London after the Olympics?
Comments
-
After the games what will happen, when everyone flies back to where they came from? Then when everyone involved with the games is all unemployed at the same time? That unemployment chart looks scary. Are things really that bad? I thought because of the Olympics everything is picking up around London. Hotels restaurants everything, what will happen after the Olympics and everyone goes home? Then all the temp staff involved with the games and security all join the dole lines?
Everything in London is artificial higher than it should be without the games, what will happen when everyone goes back home to their countries and all the staff are all laid off all at the same time.
What will happen to all the businesses who are onlly doing well because of the games? Will they all have to let staff go when its all over?
I would not like to be looking for a job after the games and everyone involved is also looking for a new job.House Prices 2007/08 £200K, Silver £5oz
Ratio 40,000 oz to 1 house.
2012 Fallen to £160K, Silver risen to £20 per ounce. So house/silver ratio fallen to 8000.
Prediction for the end of the decade, will keep falling at current rate until 1000 oz or less valued same as average house.0 -
Hope more good things...
I knew that area before all this kicked off, it was amazing that such a huge area of London was just sitting there doing nothing. The area was a dump, the ground was contaminated, yet the potential has always been huge.
When the Olympics is done the clean up of that area will now kick start the regeneration of the 100's of acres that are still available to build on, business and residential.
The story has not finished yet, and as a reminder before I head down to London on friday I am going to watch the old classic from years ago .. The Long Good Friday.. the first time I heard in a flim or news clip where that area was going to be turned into an Olympic park:)0 -
homelessskilledworker wrote: »Hope more good things...
I knew that area before all this kicked off, it was amazing that such a huge area of London was just sitting there doing nothing. The area was a dump, the ground was contaminated, yet the potential has always been huge.
When the Olympics is done the clean up of that area will now kick start the regeneration of the 100's of acres that are still available to build on, business and residential.
The story has not finished yet, and as a reminder before I head down to London on friday I am going to watch the old classic from years ago .. The Long Good Friday.. the first time I heard in a flim or news clip where that area was going to be turned into an Olympic park:)
Even more residential building going on will just make the problem worse, there is going to be loads of empty properties going cheap?House Prices 2007/08 £200K, Silver £5oz
Ratio 40,000 oz to 1 house.
2012 Fallen to £160K, Silver risen to £20 per ounce. So house/silver ratio fallen to 8000.
Prediction for the end of the decade, will keep falling at current rate until 1000 oz or less valued same as average house.0 -
Treadstone2.0 wrote: »Even more residential building going on will just make the problem worse, there is going to be loads of empty properties going cheap?
Most people who've come here for the Olympics are temporary vistiors - why on Earth, other than being quite mental, do you think this will means hordes of people leaving the city?0 -
London isn't comparable to recent sporting events in Poland/Ukraine and S Africa where they had to suddenly accommodate huge numbers of visitors with limited existing infrastructure; it's already a major tourist destination and world capital. A couple of extra hotels may have gone up near Stratford, but the city already had plenty (from the oppulent to budget hostels) who were making a tidy living.They are an EYESORES!!!!0
-
chewmylegoff wrote: »Can you explain, logically, why people will sell their houses because the Olympics are over?
Or, why anyone would make a long-term decision like buying a home in the first place, or how much to pay for one, on a 10 day athletics tournament happening down the road???0 -
Is it worth waiting for a while after the Olympics to buy property in London?
Is it right that many who bought before the Olympics want to get out of property ASAP after its all over?
Can I ask what kind of dream world you live in?
There is a housing shortage in London and it's not due to the Olympics. It's due to a lack of housing particularly affordable housing to rent all over London.
Also while I don't live in East London I live near two Olympic venues and I can tell you straight off the only people I know are moving, are moving because of personal reasons i.e. property too small, property too big.I'm not cynical I'm realistic
(If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)0 -
The_White_Horse wrote: »i think everyone on the planet has overegged the Olympics to the point of idiocy. I live in London. The Olympics is utter horse !!!! and has made zero difference to anything . Utter rubbish.
That's a bit of a grumbly remark TWH.:)
I haven't really held an opinion on them just beacuse it's been a bit whoosh over mt head/day to day life but the stadium is great and in a place that was just bleugh before. I haven't read what it will be used for afterwards (concerts? other sport events?) but it has made something out of an area that was just drudging along on the edges.
The sad bit is the shooting venue @ Woolwich as I saw it get built day by day and, apparently, it's being pulled own afterwards. Shame it couldn't be used for something positive post games. It is on a site with plenty of open space so only nicked a little bit oif green.0 -
Troubled buy to let investors who bought at inflated peak prices on a dream that East London would stop being a poo hole and have now felt realism and remortgaging concerns perhaps.
Not yet, but yes when everyone goes home after the Olympics and there will be loads of supply become empty and not that much demand.0 -
Out,_Vile_Jelly wrote: »London isn't comparable to recent sporting events in Poland/Ukraine and S Africa where they had to suddenly accommodate huge numbers of visitors with limited existing infrastructure; it's already a major tourist destination and world capital. A couple of extra hotels may have gone up near Stratford, but the city already had plenty (from the oppulent to budget hostels) who were making a tidy living.
That's right. Spending a bit if time up there the other day it was very evident how London can swallow up something as mega as the Olympic Games and still carry on almost as normal, without really skipping a beat. There's about five cities in the world that could do that.
So the olympics will not be a total game changer, but represents a fantastic opportunity to showpiece London and the UK in general to the rest of the world. The benefit of such visual availability should not be under-estimated. Look how much Big Mac, Coke and others are paying to have their names plastered up front. The comparable effect for brand London and brand UK will be immeasurably greater.No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.
Margaret Thatcher0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards