We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PCN final notice help!
Comments
-
Its run of the mill to receive letters threatening court action, however the chances of it happening is minuscule.
Read the letter through it bet it has a few "May" "Could" or "Consider" 's in there?
That's why I'm stressing slightly, the letter says:
'if settlement is not received within 7 days of this letter then proceedings will be lodged with the county court without further notice.
The claimant seeks to recover the above amount plus all costs of the proceedings as detailed in previous correspondence and interest at the rate of 8% per annum.'
No may could or considers:(0 -
Its what they do Fliss, all designed to scare the average person into thinking the tickets are official and have to be paid."You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"
John539 2-12-14 Post 150300 -
They'd be insane to try court action. Legally they haven't got a leg to stand on.
Once their first case is defeated in court it undermines every single letter they ever send again.
They'd be stupid to risk it.Je Suis Cecil.0 -
...The claimant seeks to recover the above amount plus all costs of the proceedings as detailed in previous correspondence and interest at the rate of 8% per annum.'
It just doesn't work for their business model.
If they issued a moneyclaim, it would automatically get transferred to your local county court. Then you would have the opportunity to submit a defence. If it actually got to a hearing - and there were only 49 of those in 2011, out of an estimated 550,000 unpaid tickets - their solicitors would have to travel to your local court, and charge the PPC £200 an hour or whatever for their time, none of which they'd get back in costs.
And, in the very unlikely event of all that happening, we've got experts on here who will sort out a defence for you.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
Yes I've read the replies, I've also read that they don't usually bother sending these court proceeding letters either. Since I'm still getting the letters I wanted some reassurance as the last letter appears to be as legit as I would expect and I wanted to gage the response from other users. I apologise for repeat posting and thank u for your reply.
Nope, they ALL send this sort of 'Final Notice or else' letter!
They ALL threaten County Court.
NOTHING HAPPENS.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
They send LOADS of letters threatening court proceedings.
Graham White Solicitors are under investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority for sending hundreds if not thousands of these letters out (actually they're sent by Debt Collectors called Roxburghe's but they don't want you to know that) without ever putting a single one in front of a judge.Je Suis Cecil.0 -
There are also now two recent landmark court cases, VCS Parking Control vs. Ronald Ibbotson, S!!!!horpe, 2012 and VCS Parking Control vs. HM Revenue & Customs, Upper Tax Tribunal, 2012. In both cases, the judges found that only the car park owner can take drivers to court. The Upper Tax Tribunal is a court of record, equivalent to the High Court, and therefore its judgement sets a legal precedent.
PS. VCS (Excel) were a particularly "litigious" PPC. They filed court papers at the last minute hoping to win by default but Mr. Ibbotson had his defence ready and printed so they were sucked in when he filed it on time.The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in my life.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
