Anyone on contract with 3?

michaeljtbrooks

Buzby wrote: »

As for the Don, I wish him well, but even he knows that his actions must be 'reasonable' and there is no price guarantee on any tariff. A 3.5% increase in not oppressive, and his Small Claims action will not set any precedent - he needs the High Court for that.

Not quite true. Small Claims Court will set a precedent for any similar cases with similar claims based upon the same or near-identical Terms (i.e. other Three customers in the same position).

It won't be able to rule on the interpretation of terms such as "material detriment" as applied to other contracts.

tehn00p

On the iphone contract, in section 10.1.d it only says "detrimental". I really hope he wins, it could help a lot of us out.

I have been going at three for 2 weeks over the traffic sense, but all they were willing to give me was a month or so free.