We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Renting a room in a house full of students. What are the Council Tax implications?
Comments
-
-
Edit: so the house would become liable, but I would be the only one who is sent an actual bill (i.e. all the other students would just get a bill for £0)?
In which case, would I still be able to apply for CT benefit if I was to leave work for a period of time?0 -
You would have a job trying to convince the other occupiers to pay the bill. <snip> If you don't pay it they have to pay it
Oh no they don't...
The case of students and non-students in the same house is a special case and liability does not attach to students - Local Government Act 2003, section 74 "Exception of students from joint and several liability"0 -
Sorry, what I was getting at is the landlord of the multi occupancy property would get the bill and split it by adding to everybody's rent in equal amounts. I wasn't very good at explaining that and I apologize for that.Oh no they don't...
The case of students and non-students in the same house is a special case and liability does not attach to students - Local Government Act 2003, section 74 "Exception of students from joint and several liability":footie:
Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0 -
My bolding. This is not the case - full time students *cannot* be held J&S liable for the CT payments [edit:incurred] by non students. The relevant info on this is in one of my much older posts. ( CIS may post back with it before I get round to finding it)You would have a job trying to convince the other occupiers to pay the bill. If you do start trying to convince them then expect to be asked to leave. It's not split ever....it's always jointly and severably liable. If you don't pay it they have to pay it and if they have to pay it they will ask you to leave so they have no further liability.
Edit - ah, cross posting. It's already been corrected
0 -
So because of that new(ish) legislation, how it would work is I would get a CT bill - not the landlord or the full-time students - and I would still be able to claim CT benefit if I was to leave work?0
-
So because of that new(ish) legislation, how it would work is I would get a CT bill - not the landlord or the full-time students - and I would still be able to claim CT benefit if I was to leave work?
Anyone liable to CT may claim CT benefit. Whether they get it depends on income. It often goes with other benefits, eg Housing benefit (by it's new name) LHA I think.This is an open forum, anyone can post and I just did !0 -
Why do you want to move into a house full of students and be almost forced to pay 75% of the council tax for what I imagine is going to be a Band C or D property? I really would reconsider moving into this property.:footie:
Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0 -
Yes, but if the bill is for the property and goes to the landlord, with his/her name on it, does that mean that I wouldn't be able to claim?
Yes of course, because you wouldn't be paying it if the landlord was.
Try to make sure your contract includes CT, or live elsewhere.This is an open forum, anyone can post and I just did !0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards