We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Advice please - boundary fence and neighbours' dog

1235»

Comments

  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    You will find that the courts have a very different view to yours

    You'll never find a case where the tenant has been taken to court for failing to pay for a storm damaged fence, let alone lost, as no landlord would want to waste the money on it.
  • slopemaster
    slopemaster Posts: 1,584 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Certainly if I were the tenant I would refuse to pay, and put up a robust argument!
  • iamcornholio
    iamcornholio Posts: 1,900 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    You'll never find a case where the tenant has been taken to court for failing to pay for a storm damaged fence, let alone lost, as no landlord would want to waste the money on it.

    It's straightforward breach of contract (ie tenancy agreement)

    Whilst the tenant is in occupation, they assume responsibility for maintenance of the fence. True, the landlord can not insist on repair of the fence whilst the tenant is in occupation as the tenant, having best interest in the property can choose to repair, leave it or remove it

    But once the tenant moves out then the fence will need to be repaired, or replaced.

    If there is a deposit, it will come out of that. Otherwise the landlord would win any claim at court as all this is well established law
  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    edited 13 May 2012 at 8:30PM
    Do you have anything to prove this? Any court cases?

    Why should the tenant pay to fix the property of the landlord? They did not cause the accident that led to the damage.

    I can understand the landlord not being forced to repair it as it does not affect the structural safety of the home, but to get a tenant to fix the landlords fence?

    Like I said, I would love to see some precedent for this... There is nothing in my tenancy agreement about fixing the fence if a tree falls on it. If I fall on it myself, sure, but not if something out of my control happens.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    It's straightforward breach of contract (ie tenancy agreement)

    Whilst the tenant is in occupation, they assume responsibility for maintenance of the fence. True, the landlord can not insist on repair of the fence whilst the tenant is in occupation as the tenant, having best interest in the property can choose to repair, leave it or remove it

    But once the tenant moves out then the fence will need to be repaired, or replaced.

    If there is a deposit, it will come out of that. Otherwise the landlord would win any claim at court as all this is well established law
    No chance at all. The deposit would be paid back, and the agency would be laughing as they paid it back in full. If it's well established, there should be a choice of cases for you to link to.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    Do you have anything to prove this? Any court cases?

    Why should the tenant pay to fix the property of the landlord? They did not cause the accident that led to the damage.

    I can understand the landlord not being forced to repair it as it does not affect the structural safety of the home, but to get a tenant to fix the landlords fence?

    Like I said, I would love to see some precedent for this... There is nothing in my tenancy agreement about fixing the fence if a tree falls on it. If I fall on it myself, sure, but not if something out of my control happens.

    Even if you fell on it, the LL would have to prove it was in a good state of repair, and all the pathways were safe etc, otherwise you could well end up claiming damages from him.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.