We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Vehicle engine size and running costs?

Options
13

Comments

  • Strider590
    Strider590 Posts: 11,874 Forumite
    ^^ Why does it say 2006????
    “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”

    <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    the issue with size MPG is that is has changed a lot over the last 10 years.

    The same basic engine in a model goes though a few generations usualy improving consumption lowering emission.


    Also there has been the tendancy to offer the same engine with multiple outputs so you can't just go ny the size.

    I would think about your useage, ok low mileage so justa bout anything would do but have you ever thought I wish I had......... at any point. say heated seats/windscreen in the winter, exta space in the boot to carry something......
  • Strider590
    Strider590 Posts: 11,874 Forumite
    ^^ Not as much as you think, an engine's displacement is a measure of how much air it can suck into all of it's cylinders combined.

    In ALL petrol vehicles, the fuel to air ratio has to be 14.7:1 (14.7 units of air to every 1 unit of fuel), any higher and your running lean, any lower and your running rich (both will damage an engine).

    Do I really need to spell this out?
    “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”

    <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/
  • AlexisV
    AlexisV Posts: 1,890 Forumite
    It's a different world now. You're used to driving an old Leyland motors runaround that was designed in the 70's.

    A modern 1.4 won't use that much more petrol than your old 1.1 and be much more drivable. Weights have increased, but engines now give more bhp per litre.

    You'll also gain much better grip and handling.
  • rev_henry
    rev_henry Posts: 4,965 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Strider590 wrote: »
    ^^ Why does it say 2006????
    Presumably imported and first registered in the UK 2006. Quite what possessed anyone to import a 15 year old clapped out cadillac I have no idea.
  • Lum
    Lum Posts: 6,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Some people like them, and it's usually cheaper to import blindly and then fix anything, than to make several trips to a foreign country to inspect the car personally. Same reason I imported a 16 year old (though thankfully not clapped out) Nissan.
  • andrew-the-cat
    andrew-the-cat Posts: 333 Forumite
    100 Posts
    How about a small turbocharged or twincharged engine. Most manufaturers seem to be going down that route now that people actually care about fuel economy and emissions.

    A prime example is BMW, who used high capacity naturally aspirated engines. They are now downsizing the engines but adding turbochargers. This increases performance but reduces fuel consumption. E60 M5 has a 5.0 litre V10. 507bhp - 19mpg combined. F10 M5 has a 4.4 litre twin turbocharged V8. 555bhp - 28.5mpg combined.
  • rev_henry
    rev_henry Posts: 4,965 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    How about a small turbocharged or twincharged engine. Most manufaturers seem to be going down that route now that people actually care about fuel economy and emissions.

    A prime example is BMW, who used high capacity naturally aspirated engines. They are now downsizing the engines but adding turbochargers. This increases performance but reduces fuel consumption. E60 M5 has a 5.0 litre V10. 507bhp - 19mpg combined. F10 M5 has a 4.4 litre twin turbocharged V8. 555bhp - 28.5mpg combined.
    The stats for the 535d are even more incredible. 0-60 in 5.3, 465 lb ft of torque (more than the M5 I believe) and 50mpg combined. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?! And, why would anyone buy an M5?
  • sj999
    sj999 Posts: 61 Forumite
    Depreciation is a huge cost in running a second hand car. If you don't do many miles buying a larger engined secondhand car could be cheaper then buying a newer smaller engined car.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.