PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Police Raid on rented accommodation

Apologies if this is in the wrong forum.

My parents have recently had some bad news. They have been told that the police forced entry into one of the flats because the tenants were growing drugs, we know that they were arresting and believe on bail and awaiting court. We do not live in the same area as the flat anymore so we are dealing with everything from afar. AND the estate agent is not the best. (we were trying to change and this happens!)

We were wondering if the police/is the tenant responsible for the damages?

Many Thanks
Newbie8
«1

Comments

  • phill99
    phill99 Posts: 9,093 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    The police certainly won't pay for the damage. It should be the tenant as their behaviour has bought about the p[olice action. You have a deposit I am guessing but whether that is enough to cover the cost of a door is another matter.
    Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.
  • Just because the tenants have been charged does not mean they will get a custodial sentence, so I'm assuming that the tenancy has not come to and end, and it may not. Until then the damage is the tenant's to put right if the property is no longer secure. Once the tenancy has come to an end you can make a reasonable deduction from their deposit for doing so.
  • If the police found anything inside the address which was part of a criminal offence (drugs in this case) or arrested somebody then the repair to the door rests with the landlord/tennant. There is no way the police will be paying for the damage.
  • brit1234
    brit1234 Posts: 5,385 Forumite
    The police don't have to pay as they found the drugs. The tenants are unlikely to pay as they are criminals. I think you are most likely going to fit the bill. Who vetted the tenants?
    :exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.

    Save our Savers
  • rentergirl
    rentergirl Posts: 371 Forumite
    This will turn into a very bad game of legal ping pong. I think you might need to pay for legal advice. More definitive, and you can bring it to the police who will deny al responsibility, even if they are liable.
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    Where are the tenants now?

    What state is the property in?

    Chadderton police found one drug growing property where access to the back of the house was via the staircase as they had shut the doors so they could grow more.
    https://twitter.com/#!/GMPChadderton
    They took a photo and posted it here!

    Regardless of where you live - someone trusted needs to visit the property and do an inspection, ensure it's secure and to start dealing with the tenants (I assume eviction is on the cards if they are still there)
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    edited 26 April 2012 at 10:04AM
    OP - this scenario is part and parcel of being a LL. It is irrelevant that you don't live locally - you either travel to sort property issues out or you get someone who is efficient to act on your behalf.

    Notify the Ts formally that you expect them to foot the bill and get the job sorted. Note that you can't expect a T to cough up for a better door than the one you originally had in place. If the T's deposit won't cover it then you may have to (edit: pursue) the matter to the small claims court.
    rentergirl wrote: »
    . More definitive, and you can bring it to the police who will deny al responsibility, even if they are liable.
    The OP is highly unlikely to get recompense from the police - if the search was "lawful, and the force used can be shown to be reasonable, proportionate and necessary to effect entry". For more info on when recompense* is* likely to be made check out the "Code of Practice for Searches of Premises by Police Officers."

    Illegal acts by the T at the property can be used as a Ground for repossession but note that it is one of the discretionary grounds. Are the Ts up to date with their rent and/or have they committed any other breaches of their tenancy?

    Note that even if your Ts were held in custody you still have to end the tenancy correctly or you will lay yourself open to criminal charges of illegal eviction.

    Has any tenancy deposit paid been scheme registered and the scheme's prescribed info passed to the Ts? Has a S21 notice been served at any point ( must be post registration of deposit and post signing of tenancy agreement for it to be valid)
  • Fuzzyness
    Fuzzyness Posts: 635 Forumite
    in my tenancy agreement i seem to recall there is a clause about not using drugs at the property. is there something similar in yours?
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    Fuzzyness wrote: »
    in my tenancy agreement i seem to recall there is a clause about not using drugs at the property. is there something similar in yours?

    I suspect most tenancies don't state that murdering people on the premises isn't an allowed either.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    Fuzzyness wrote: »
    in my tenancy agreement i seem to recall there is a clause about not using drugs at the property. is there something similar in yours?
    It does not have to be a specific clause within the tenancy agreement - see my comment above about discretionary Grounds for repossession, afforded by statute

    Housing Act (1988), Schedule 2, Part II

    Grounds on which Court may Order Possession

    Ground 14
    [F11The tenant or a person residing in or visiting the dwelling-house—
    (a)has been guilty of conduct causing or likely to cause a nuisance or annoyance to a person residing, visiting or otherwise engaging in a lawful activity in the locality, or

    (b)has been convicted of—
    (i)using the dwelling-house or allowing it to be used for immoral or illegal purposes, or
    (ii)an [F12indictable] offence committed in, or in the locality of, the dwelling-house.]
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.