Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion

SLG_3

Cardew wrote: »

Welcome back Maz!

Talking about foolish and unbelievable comments, any more information about the WHICH Best Buy for Energy that you claim?

How about patman99's electricity prices that you believe and support?

'fess up Maz!

P.S.
Nothing in here to report is there? just asking questions?

P.P.S
Aren't you supposed to declare you are a UW ID

givin out personal info does need reporting im sure u would b if ur personal details were stamped on here

so whats ur prob with maz coz speakin out bot quentin use ur brain look back at all his posts read properly and u will realise hes an ex-distributor who got sacked so tryin his dam hardest to bad mouth uw
even though hes still saving with his CASHBACK CARD lol now thats funny hes band mouthin to stop others earning and helping people save money which everyone needs to do, because he knows what a great business opportunity it is with uw but he blew it

jimexbox

Higgins-Sons wrote: »

This has already been reported if they are not removed legal action will be taken as i have already stated to Quentin as this is a vialation of the data protection act and who ever puts private details on here will be legally prosecuted, my legal team are already dealing with this. and together with any hacking into files from various websites.

Whatever you do, don't get uptomyeyeballs to represent you. His legal advice has been truly shocking, not to mention serious concerns regarding his honesty. He could always ring his mates at the Which? legal department.;)

1carminestocky

Cardew wrote: »

Well you are quick!

Was it you?

Err, no, it wasn't me but if it makes you feel taller just keep imagining it is! And when can we expect to see this blazing fast speedtest, you old globetrotter? :rolleyes:

PS Talking of diversionary tactics, you appear to have totally ignored my post number 8687. Will you take up the challenge?

jimexbox

SLG wrote: »

these comments get more and more unbelieveable as they come on
must say hiliarious to read m8

Its genuine advice. Take it or leave it, but watching LA Law and Starsky and Hutch does not make you a lawyer. Although he had developed (through turning informer;)) an extensive network of legal connections over at Which? magazine. They may be able to help you...

SLG_3

jimexbox wrote: »

Its genuine advice. Take it or leave it, but watching LA Law and Starsky and Hutch does not make you a lawyer. Although he had developed (through turning informer;)) an extensive network of legal connections over at Which? magazine. They may be able to help you...

u are funny mr XBOX i aint no lawyer but i dont need legal advise he does. So do u have proof he works with WHICH? have u rang them urself and asked to speak to mr uptomyeyeballs OF HERE lol i doubt u have i think i will tomorrow just to see if its truth or lies.maybe u should do the same

Cardew

1carminestocky wrote: »

Err, no, it wasn't me but if it makes you feel taller just keep imagining it is!

Well you are normally a lot more emphatic than that with your denials. You usually bring your sons into the denial.

Let me ask you this so you have as little wriggle room as possible.

Do you deny having anything to do with that post. i.e. your son/wife/friend actually posted it etc.

So I will ask once more, do you absolutely deny any involvement with that post?

kippen_noedel

jimexbox wrote: »

SLG wrote: »

SLG

Can you do me a favour and ditch the 'cool' txt speak? However valid you points may be, they are lost trying to decipher what you are writing.:T

lol, is that what it was... I just thought he had a speech impediment, now I see he's just another rep, so must be a something else altogether.

kippen_noedel

AvengerSeawolf wrote: »

You fail to see how sad and weak your continued insistence on visiting private UW forums makes you look.

actually no, it doesn't show that at all

it shows how weak the protocols used by the UW forum are, a simple search on google cache shows how to walk right on past them.

SLG_3

kippen_noedel wrote: »

jimexbox wrote: »

lol, is that what it was... I just thought he had a speech impediment, now I see he's just another rep, so must be a something else altogether.

U MAKE ME LAUGH LOL BIT OUT OF DATE THAT POST AND SINCE I WROTE THAT IVE JOINED AS A REP
BUT PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING QUENTIN AS GONE QUIET SINCE BEEN POINTED OUT HES A EX-DISTRIBUTOR WITH A GRUDGE

Plushchris

SLG wrote: »

you need to take the link off that shows higgins-sons personal details , u will b in alot of trouble for that im sure u wouldnt want ur personal details splashed all over here

That link that shows Higgins-sons personal details is in the public domain anyway, anyone who wanted to find out who was responsible for that website can look that up, I thought that was common knowledge?

Cant see how someone can get in trouble for sharing information that is made available to the public anyway :rolleyes: