We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

London to Tokyo just £265 Return!

Options
24

Comments

  • Equaliser123
    Equaliser123 Posts: 3,404 Forumite
    Mr_Wang wrote: »
    Have flown Aeroflot twice and not had a single problem.

    They now fly Airbus iirc and all the safety issues were from bygone eras of dodgy Russian Planes. They haven't had an accident for 18 years which is good enough for me.
    I wonder whether those that wouldn't fly Aeroflot would fly Air France who have had 6 fatal accidents since Aeroflot last did.

    That said, those on a MSE site claiming they would pay at least £300 more rather than change planes - Can I just ask.....What are you doing on a MSE site???

    Moneysaving is about value for money. Not just the cheapest. It's about service, IFE, routes, etc.

    Glad you have flown "twice" and not had an incident........ Statistics still show that the risk of dying on an Aeroflot aircraft is higher than a lot of other airlines.

    Oh, and simply because an airline flies the same aircraft type, doesn't mean to say they are as safe. Thought that it would have been obvious that it is down to maintenance, crew training, etc.
  • hannahO_2
    hannahO_2 Posts: 461 Forumite
    Why pay when you can get a free return ticket the govt is giving away. Even a free place at a university.

    Even then, it's an offer I will refuse.
    You might die suddenly in a few months. It seems to be becoming a regular occurrence among young healthy students.
    Money is not the root of all evil.
    It depends on how you obtain it and how you use it.

    Have you sold your soul to the devil?
  • I couldent find any cheap flights. Ah well
    2011 Challenge £276.71 / £11,000:T
  • Mr_Wang
    Mr_Wang Posts: 1,302 Forumite
    Moneysaving is about value for money. Not just the cheapest. It's about service, IFE, routes, etc.

    Glad you have flown "twice" and not had an incident........ Statistics still show that the risk of dying on an Aeroflot aircraft is higher than a lot of other airlines.

    Oh, and simply because an airline flies the same aircraft type, doesn't mean to say they are as safe. Thought that it would have been obvious that it is down to maintenance, crew training, etc.

    Having just checked, not a single person has died as a result of an Aeroflot flight in 18 years.

    Almost 50,000 thousand people have died on Britains roads in that time.
    I know what your thinking - More people drive than flights, and you'd be right. So taking into account frequency your chance of dying on a British road is around 1:250 or 0.004%

    Having a fatal accident on an aircraft is around 1:10000000 or about 0.0000001%

    So, considering Air France has an accident rate of 6:1 over the last 18 years compared to Aeroflot and that American Airlines, United Airlines and even BA have all had major accidents (though BA was thankfully not fatal) just what do you base your rubbish on?

    BTW do you drive?
  • Equaliser123
    Equaliser123 Posts: 3,404 Forumite
    Mr_Wang wrote: »
    Having just checked, not a single person has died as a result of an Aeroflot flight in 18 years.

    Almost 50,000 thousand people have died on Britains roads in that time.
    I know what your thinking - More people drive than flights, and you'd be right. So taking into account frequency your chance of dying on a British road is around 1:250 or 0.004%

    Having a fatal accident on an aircraft is around 1:10000000 or about 0.0000001%

    So, considering Air France has an accident rate of 6:1 over the last 18 years compared to Aeroflot and that American Airlines, United Airlines and even BA have all had major accidents (though BA was thankfully not fatal) just what do you base your rubbish on?

    BTW do you drive?

    I'd choose AA, UAL, BA or even Air France over Aeroflot any day of the week. Lack of fatalities doesn't equate to a safe airline.

    Yes I do drive. Oh, and I was a pilot in the Royal Air Force for some years so my understanding of air safety is actually rather high.

    In any event, air travel isn't just about safety. It's about service and experience. Aeroflot provides negatives in both respects.

    So if you consider taking a massively indirect flight with a poor airline to be worth saving a couple of hundred quid, then great.

    I don't. But then I tend to fly Emirates Business or First when heading in that direction.
  • Mr_Wang
    Mr_Wang Posts: 1,302 Forumite
    I'd choose AA, UAL, BA or even Air France over Aeroflot any day of the week. Lack of fatalities doesn't equate to a safe airline.

    Yes I do drive. Oh, and I was a pilot in the Royal Air Force for some years so my understanding of air safety is actually rather high.

    In any event, air travel isn't just about safety. It's about service and experience. Aeroflot provides negatives in both respects.

    So if you consider taking a massively indirect flight with a poor airline to be worth saving a couple of hundred quid, then great.

    I don't. But then I tend to fly Emirates Business or First when heading in that direction.

    So if you fly First/Business, are the epitome of air safety due to being a pilot, and are happy to pay about £300+ extra for a smile and ice in your drink - Just what are you even doing on this site?

    Or is it just that (like your arguments against Aeroflot) you and your claims lack any real substance.
  • Equaliser123
    Equaliser123 Posts: 3,404 Forumite
    Mr_Wang wrote: »
    So if you fly First/Business, are the epitome of air safety due to being a pilot, and are happy to pay about £300+ extra for a smile and ice in your drink - Just what are you even doing on this site?

    Or is it just that (like your arguments against Aeroflot) you and your claims lack any real substance.

    Being a bit silly now.

    Oh, and if you think that Emirates Business is £300 extra, you really do need to check your facts.
  • If I had £280 on me spare. I would deffo book this. Fair enough people say bad things, but I could drive my car tomorrow and someone could crash into me and I might die.

    If you dont have much money like me its great to see far away places for cheap.
    2011 Challenge £276.71 / £11,000:T
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Being a bit silly now.

    Oh, and if you think that Emirates Business is £300 extra, you really do need to check your facts.

    So how much cheaper is it?
  • budgetflyer
    budgetflyer Posts: 5,949 Forumite
    But then I tend to fly Emirates Business or First when heading in that direction.

    Which makes your argument all the more ludicrous. Comparing Emirates business class with Aeroflot economy -Crazy.
    If you are used to staying in 5 star hotels then you are probably unqualified to pass fair judgement on a backpackers hostel.

    its superb offer
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.