We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Under the Counter Cigarettes - Bad for consumers in its present form

15678911»

Comments

  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Plus you have to take into account that money spent by the NHS on "smoking related illnesses" will not necessarily be spent on smokers.

    While its true smokers may be more prone to those illnesses, a non-smoker being diagnosed with them is far from unheard of.

    As for smokers more prone to taking days off......that could be a coincidence or there may be some other related factor responsible for that. Not all smokers will follow that trend, the only time i've had off work in the past 8 years were down to an injury i received at work and the death of a loved one for whom I was next of kin.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • Azari
    Azari Posts: 4,317 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    anatomical wrote: »
    "44.9% of UK children between the ages of 13-15 are exposed to second hand smoke in the home".

    That statistic is just about worthless without some explanation of the methodology used to derive it?

    Are they suggesting that 44.9% of children live in a home with a smoker (unlikely, given the current proportion of smokers), or do they count one visit to the home of a friend or relative where they are exposed to smoke? Or something in between?
    There are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Azari wrote: »
    That statistic is just about worthless without some explanation of the methodology used to derive it?

    Are they suggesting that 44.9% of children live in a home with a smoker (unlikely, given the current proportion of smokers), or do they count one visit to the home of a friend or relative where they are exposed to smoke? Or something in between?

    Probably taken from a survey of people buying nicotine patches or something :rotfl:

    You can fiddle with statistics to make them say what you want. The more precise the statistic, the more likely someone has fiddled with it (ie why 13-15 year olds? Why not people under 18? Probably because the under 18 figure doesn't support whatever point they were trying to make).
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • afly
    afly Posts: 105 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 3 April 2012 at 4:46PM
    It's got nothing to do with money, or health concerns, it's all about politics. Smokers are repeatedly targeted by legislation because they are easy victims.

    It is one of the few political areas where politicians can be under the safe assumption that no matter how bizarre the legislation, it will be passed and they can claim a triumph.


    They could legislate that all smokers should be sectioned in work camps and kicked to a bloody pulp each day in front of their families and the anti-smokers would still scream for more.

    Never make the mistake of thinking that politicians care about you, no matter which side of the fence you sit on this.
  • getzls
    getzls Posts: 761 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hear hear afly.Yes, i'm a smoker too. But there is a lot of truth in that post.
  • CKhalvashi
    CKhalvashi Posts: 12,134 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    They'll still see parents/family/friends smoking at home and outside work places/restaurants/bars etc. When I started smoking, it wasnt because I saw them in the shops! In fact, I had no clue where you got them - even though they were on prominent display. It was due to family and friends smoking. Its a impressionable mind thing, the people you like do it so you end up doing it. Not peer pressure, just...a growing process i guess. If they really want to stop the next generation smoking, imo they're going to have to make it illegal to smoke in front of anyone below the age of 21.

    This is the thing. I’ve got my girls (8 and 10) out the back of OH’s business today (bar) with a coke each, however they’ve both seen me come in/out for a cigarette.

    Surely it makes no difference to anyone whether I smoke or not?

    CK
    💙💛 💔
  • Jakeandme
    Jakeandme Posts: 84 Forumite
    No need for it, people are being priced out of smoking, no need to hide it aswell. All we will see is tobacco sales plummet and traffic through dover increasing.

    Yep dead right spadoosh, my mate has just got back from France with my duty free.

    Haven't paid uk tax on tobacco since the early seventies.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.