We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Lloyds Mastercard refusing section 75 refund
gingerdonna
Posts: 1 Newbie
in Credit cards
we bought a bed and a mattress from a company called your furnished - the bed broke and the mattress is faulty. We did complain to them but Communication has now broken down with them directly and they are refusing to do anything about it. We have now claimed from Lloyds under section 75 - its about 900 but Lloyds have written a letter back saying that they are not responsible in customer disputes and refusing to do anything about it - what are my options?? Help me!!
0
Comments
-
More info is needed. How long have you had the bed ? Was it faulty on delivery ? For a Section 75 claim you will need to provide evidence of the fault, what was the conversation you had with the seller ? Why have they stopped communicating with you ? Have they offered anything at all ?0
-
What did you say in your original letter?
Ultimately you need to write back and say you arent looking for them to become responsible for a customer dispute but you are claiming under section 75 of the CCA that they are liable for the faulty goods received.0 -
faulty or damaged by you?Don't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
-
The principle of s75 is that the CC is placed in the same position as the supplier (subject to the transaction being over £100 and entered into by the main cardholder). The CC is jointly and severally liable for delivery of a functioning mattress!
So the communication/break down in relationship with the supplier is not strictly relevant. You are free to go after the CC rightaway. Whatever the CC says, you do not have to attempt to resolve the dispute with the merchant first.
So it just comes down to consumer law - how old is the mattress, is it faulty or was it wear'n'tear etc. If you think you have a claim against the supplier, then you have a claim against the CC.0 -
I would threaten LTSB with small claims court"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
gingerdonna wrote: »we bought a bed and a mattress from a company called your furnished - the bed broke and the mattress is faulty. We did complain to them but Communication has now broken down with them directly and they are refusing to do anything about it. We have now claimed from Lloyds under section 75 - its about 900 but Lloyds have written a letter back saying that they are not responsible in customer disputes and refusing to do anything about it - what are my options?? Help me!!
If Lloyds are claiming it's a dispute, could it be possible that this is not a simple case of "my bed is broken and my mattress is faulty".
We need more information, how long have you had the products, what's the fault. How did the bed break. Have you had any offer at all from the company you purchased it from etc...Helping the country to sleep better....ZZZzzzzzzz0 -
OP has been ecconomical with the facts.On what basis ?
As has been explained, IF the goods were not of merchantable quality then LTSB are jointly liable for refund"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
OP has been ecconomical with the facts.
As has been explained, IF the goods were not of merchantable quality then LTSB are jointly liable for refund
Thats right, BUT, the OP's card issuer has declined to help with a dispute, and they say they are now claiming under Section 75 through Lloyds and that Lloyds have declined to help with this also. There is obviously a reason for this.
Without the TRUE story, it's no good advising someone to go down the Small Claims route. If the OP needs help with their options they should provide more information.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
