Parking Eye/Roxburghe/Graham White

HO87

vax2002 wrote: »

well with a bit of Luck he wont be 76
Twisting conning lying **** he is.

Ah... erm...possibly.

However, rest assured that his understanding of contract law is so comprehensive that, in the past, he has been prepared to argue in court - on behalf of his clients - that a gang of builders who claimed that they were not paid enough for their work were entitled to take up "exclusive occupation" of a house effectively evicting the family who lived there.

Ah, he lost. Of course.

Full story - Here

solotrom

give_them_FA wrote: »

This will only be of use if you are contemplating bringing a case against them for harassment. You should open the conversation by stating that the call is being recorded to be used in possible connection with Court proceedings. Most likely result, there won't be anything to record; but they may just be stupid enough to carry on and having warned them, it is admissible. If you are not planning action against them, then why bother? When "I don't owe you anything so clear off" and phone down before they get a word in edgeways usually does the job?

Have you tried googling the numbers, btw?

No the message on my phone is simply 'unknown number'.

I wasn't really thinking of anything other than passing these on as examples of what to expect from these clowns. A bit like the scans of the letter - there is safety in knowing the sort of things they will send/say.

Having said that I'd love to get one of them to say something really threatening or lie to me about the law. Then I'd have grounds for harassment and mark my words I'd take it further.

HO87

solotrom wrote: »

No the message on my phone is simply 'unknown number'.

I wasn't really thinking of anything other than passing these on as examples of what to expect from these clowns. A bit like the scans of the letter - there is safety in knowing the sort of things they will send/say.

Having said that I'd love to get one of them to say something really threatening or lie to me about the law. Then I'd have grounds for harassment and mark my words I'd take it further.

You do not need threats or lies for there to be harassment. All there need be is a "course of behaviour" and unwarranted demands. Couple them with the entirely standard (for DCA's) threat of civil action, loss of credit record etc and that is more than enough.

give_them_FA

yes, as you may have picked up elsewhere, I did successfully sue some of these people for harassment and was paid nearly 1K in damages and costs. You can try if you want; problem is that they are harder to pin down now as a result and as soon as they are given a warning they run a mile. PM me for suggestions, walls have eyes here.

solotrom

Today I have received a final warning from Graham White solicitors telling me I have 14 days to pay up or name the driver or he 'intends to see his client's instructions to apply for an application to the court under civil procedural rules 31.16 - disclosure before proceedings start.

What's the advice? Can anyone explain this jargon to me please?

Thanks in anticipation.

trisontana

That old chestnut!. They forget to mention that "civil procedural rules 31.16" does not apply to the small claims track. Just keep ignoring these clowns.

give_them_FA

Graham White isn't a solicitor because he doesn't exist. If he did exist, and he was a solicitor, he would know that this is one of the emptiest of empty threats. This rule does not apply to any case they would bring, because they won't be bringing any case.

More bull from the people that are more full of sh*t than your local sewage farm. Just keep on ignoring it, you are not far away from the point at which they quit. Once Graham "I am a total phoney" White gets involved you are on the home straight.

solotrom

As usual you have put my mind at rest. You guys are great!

give_them_FA

Yes, and if you fancy having a punt at suing them, save all the letters.

DavidNicole

I have been reading this thread with interest!

We have just received an unpaid parking notice from Roxburghe, it's for a ticket that was placed on our car, parked in our own space, with our parking permit on display, we didn't contact the ticket issuer after receiving the ticket and have now got a bill from Roxburghe.

Should I reply using one of the letter templates or just ignore it?

Advice apreciated.

Thanks