We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Just a little bit of fun
Comments
-
Toxteth_OGrady wrote: »...and connect your psu with a 500 quid kettle lead. :eek: Whoops, wrong thread :rotfl: :rotfl:4.8kWp 12x400W Longhi 9.6 kWh battery Giv-hy 5.0 Inverter, WSW facing Essex . Aint no sunshine ☀️ Octopus gas fixed dec 24 @ 5.74 tracker again+ Octopus Intelligent Flux leccy0
-
-
Found CPU:
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4300 @ 2.10GHz
Penryn Core
1196.1 MHz Clock
797.4 MHz FSB
1024 KB L2 Cache
0 V
Step R0
Found Memory:
3072 MB DDR2
398.7 MHz
Cl 6-6-6-18
Found Motherboard:
Sony Corporation
VGN-NW20EF_S
Thread Count = 2
40.2 seconds.. but have a lot of background programs runningSealed pot challenger # 10
1v100 £15/3000 -
34.967 sec
On a Pentium Dual-Core E5500 2.80ghz with 4gb of DDR2 RAM, three years old now and I'm glad the moby/cpu are still going ok as my gfx card failed this morning0 -
probably, but why would you want to?
Curiosity more than anything.
Might give it a go tonight and post the results.
DCM & Tox - Thanks for that.:wall: Flagellation, necrophilia and bestiality - Am I flogging a dead horse? :wall:
Any posts are my opinion and only that. Please read at your own risk.0 -
Hi
Just checking to see if my
Old desktop hp pavillion 403.uk , at least 8 yrs old
1.8 Celeron., 2gb ram, xp pro, office 2007
318.891 secs
Was the slowest!A shadowy flight into the dangerous world of a man who does not exist.
A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent,
the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.0 -
Hi
Just checking to see if my
Old desktop hp pavillion 403.uk , at least 8 yrs old
1.8 Celeron., 2gb ram, xp pro, office 2007
318.891 secs
Was the slowest!
TBH much slower than I'd expect, try closeds' sticky
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2436849
My clunker testing machine, with allsorts of rubbish on it, 2.3 Celeron with 1GB ram, XP pro =147secs.
Following on from post#64
Got around to firing up one of my other thin clients, 1GHz, ram maxed out at 512MB, running brand new image of XPe. 25 processes running, result..............386secs.
Would have done screen print, but it doesn't seem to have a way of saving it.Move along, nothing to see.0 -
14.788
Vaio F series
64 bt quad core0 -
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards