We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mystery Shopping Thread 22 *PLEASE READ THE OP FIRST**PLEASE NO CLIENT NAMES OR FEES*
Comments
-
me no likely no design either...
seems less "soft"on the eye if that makes sense0 -
Only issue I'm finding is on the UserCP when I go to select a thread it pops up the thread text thus obscuring the link so I cant get in.
I like the actual look of it thoughThis was 6 months out of date so I've changed it.:j:j:j:j0 -
I like it. It's cleaner0
-
notliking that the user details are spread out across the page,seems like too much whitespace0
-
TractorGirl327 wrote: »Good grief have you all seen the new design for the forum? It's dire!!!
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3796829
Yes it's not the best0 -
Things ive learnt today
#1 Not all cinema visits are the same, even with the same company. I did read the brief and looked at the report, but only when I was having to expand on everything, and then summarise the whole visit again, i realised it was turning in to a RE report !
I did leave some "helpful" comments in the section on feedback on the questionnaire and have actually written that I have provided a detailed response above twice already I assume this third box asking for the information yet again is an error. If they want to sack me off fine but ill happily not do another of those reports again
Im unsure if its a new client or a competitor visit, but ill be steering clearing of that chain from now on any how.
#2 Dont go on orange wednesday and not expect to have to queue 20 mins to get a ticket, in a "queue" thats a jumple of people that is on the verge of turning to an unorganised riot
#3 I dont know any one that would apply for a PERMANENT UNPAID JOB below minimum wage and is this not SLAVERY ? http://jobcentreplus.jobhits.co.uk/TESCO-NIGHT-SHIFT-id-BSD-27442
#4 The muppets is a great film well worth seeing0 -
#3 I dont know any one that would apply for a PERMANENT UNPAID JOB below minimum wage and is this not SLAVERY ? http://jobcentreplus.jobhits.co.uk/T...T-id-BSD-27442
Thats utterly obscene and yet another indication of how some of the largest companies are taking advantage of peoples desperation to get off the dole and do anything which might lead to a permanent wage.0 -
mskitten2904 wrote: »That just made me laugh out loud! My daughter is giving me funny looks now lol x
Sorry - that may have been my fault! I did get a wondrous floor show yesterday doing one of those visits. The way they were all cleaning and tidying around me, I thought the staff might be about to break into a dance routine especially for my entertainment.0 -
whitelabel wrote: »Things ive learnt today
#1 Not all cinema visits are the same, even with the same company. I did read the brief and looked at the report, but only when I was having to expand on everything, and then summarise the whole visit again, i realised it was turning in to a RE report !
I did leave some "helpful" comments in the section on feedback on the questionnaire and have actually written that I have provided a detailed response above twice already I assume this third box asking for the information yet again is an error. If they want to sack me off fine but ill happily not do another of those reports again
Im unsure if its a new client or a competitor visit, but ill be steering clearing of that chain from now on any how.
Thats not the fleece cinemas is it?whitelabel wrote: »#3 I dont know any one that would apply for a PERMANENT UNPAID JOB below minimum wage and is this not SLAVERY ? http://jobcentreplus.jobhits.co.uk/TESCO-NIGHT-SHIFT-id-BSD-27442
Is that even legal?This was 6 months out of date so I've changed it.:j:j:j:j0 -
It's wrong - it's been advertised as a vacancy when it shouldn't have apparently - it should have been advertised as a work programme/training initiative0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards