parking ticket from shopping park

Coupon-mad

ppeterson1750 wrote: »

Ok Terbor16, so thats your real name then !!!!

I do not own or work for a PPC, I have also not made any claims that I am unable to prove.

In the interests of a balanced view, surely if a person claims to have done something then it is not unexpected for them to substantiate those claims so that everyone can judge for themselves ?

We have all seen examples of PPCs stating they have won cases and the first thing that is asked (and rightly so) is proof of their claims.

I see no difference here, Give them FA has made a claim which he is simply being asked to prove.

So, yet again, over to FA to prove it in the same way as you ask a PPC to prove their reported victories

Well if you are lying and do actually run a PPC I say that you are Derbyshire's finest, namely Simon Renshaw-Smith.

If you don't run a PPC then I say you are a top tea boy at the BPA such as Kelvin Reynolds or Paul Necus or Patrick 'foot in mouth' Troy. Are you someone who has ever been on Watchdog?

TwoTone

ppeterson1750 wrote: »

If proof were given then it is proof.

So, nothing to stop them producing it ! (if such proof exists)

You want proof? I am a regular poster but using a different username.

---

Original Message

---

From: Legal [mailto:legal@ukcps.net]
Sent: 26 January 2012 10:44
To:
Subject: Payment
Importance: High

Dear Sir
I am in receipt of your correspondence 'letter before action'. We apologise
sincerely for any inconvenience you have suffered and are willing to make
you a ex gratis payment of £98.40 as detailed in your letter.
We can either send you a cheque or make a FPS (fast payment system) payment
direct into your bank. If you wish us to do this please supply your bank acc
number and sort code by return.
I can also confirm that UKCPS Ltd are accepting liability for this amount
and once again apologise for any inconvenience caused.


Peter Haswell Office Manager
UKCPS LTD Registered Company Number 5090613
Registered in England, address: UKCPS LIMITED
1200 CENTURY WAY THORPE PARK BUSINESS PARK
COLTON LEEDS WEST YORKSHIRE LS15 8ZA



27/01/2012 FASTER PAYMENTS RECEIPT REF.RE PAYMENT FROM U K C P S Limited £98.40


I have now made payment. Please could you confirm receipt and that this
matter is now closed - an email reply will suffice.
Regards

Peter Haswell Office Manager
UKCPS LTD Registered Company Number 5090613
Registered in England, address: UKCPS LIMITED
1200 CENTURY WAY THORPE PARK BUSINESS PARK
COLTON LEEDS WEST YORKSHIRE LS15 8ZA

Dear
Thank you for your e-mail yesterday and I understand from the attached that this matter has now been resolved to your satisfaction.
I trust you will continue to enjoy your visits to New Mersey Shopping Park in Speke and as ever, would appreciate your thoughts on ways we can improve the shopping experience.

Kind regards

JJ

Jonathan Jessop

Director

Commercial Property Management

Savills, Belvedere, 12 Booth Street, Manchester, M2 4AW

That do?

Plus Coupon-Mad was told by me about this payment she took my word for it but never asked for proof. Unfortunately they paid up before I had a chance to go for harassment!

You can confirm it with Pete if you wish!

give_them_FA

Ah! So now your story is, you were just hanging around Portsmouth County Court and you thought that you would take in a little case, even though it had absolutely nothing to do with you? I'm sure, Mr. PPeterson!

Anyone out there believe that? :rotfl:

And now you think Coupon Mad and myself are the same person?

Anyone out there believe that? :rotfl:

The only thing that we all know for certain is that you are not who or what you are trying to portray yourself as.

Everyone out there believe that? :rotfl:

The simple fact is, that you scammers are frightened to death of an organised campaign to respond to your threats with legal action, particularly against the landowner- which will likely get you the sack.

That is why you are doing your best to try and pooh-pooh the idea.

But if Coupon Mad is not, in your eyes, a suitable person to verify my claim, then nominate someone else. Just don't let it be someone who has just joined and has 3 posts to their name...

Coupon-mad

give_them_FA wrote: »

And now you think Coupon Mad and myself are the same person?

Anyone out there believe that? :rotfl:

Not last time I looked, no! :rotfl:

give_them_FA

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Not last time I looked, no! :rotfl:

Are you quite sure? Do you need stronger glasses? Or perhaps I should be saying do I need stronger glasses? After all, PPCs never lie and are never mistaken, right? :rotfl:

give_them_FA

who you said didn't turn up... so what was your interest? next lie, Perky?

give_them_FA

ppeterson1750 wrote: »

So, still avoiding posting the evidence then ?

Just admit, you lied just to appear more important than you are and just to get people to listen to you.. you will feel much better.

I would LOVE to be proved wrong, so over to you .. Come on, show that you are not a liar.

I think you are the only one on this forum accusing me of lying. And everyone knows who you are... however I will be sending the evidence to someone who is trusted by all the members that count- which latter does not include you. I can only presume you enjoy being regarded as scum, or you would not be doing the job which you do. Or perhaps the money you scam justifies it.

give_them_FA

ppeterson1750 wrote: »

I'm good but not that good to know a party will not turn up in advance.

So if you were there for a case involving Shoal Enforcement who didn't turn up, then you were suing them, were you? Yet you didn't boast about it... but you just happened to decide to hang around and listen to a case (which if you are to be believed) was brought by Perky? Who isn't you? :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

There's only one liar here, buddy, and it isn't me.

And to answer your "simple question" the evidence will be produced. Not to you, that's all.

Trebor16

ppeterson1750 wrote: »

Simple question for you.

Why are you objecting so much about showing a court order (which is of public record anyway). ?

You are the first to want any and all documents to be shown for anything you do not fully think is true, so why the double standard ?

A claim for harassment could have been settled before getting to court.

Trebor16

ppeterson1750 wrote: »

FA has stated previously he has a court order, please try and keep up.

I wasn't referring to FA. By the way, I did think of you when doing my shopping earlier on today whilst in the bakery section. I looked at a loaf of bread and had to do a double take before realising the label said "thick cut".:D