We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Osborne loses his nerve in the face of Union solidarity

1246720

Comments

  • Killmark
    Killmark Posts: 313 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    The teachers are a slightly different case as their pensions are funded for the most part.

    The current value of civil service unfunded pensions is, IIRC, £1,000,000,000,000 (a trillion quid) and that is just the cost of putting away enough money today to make the required payments in future. With a currently accrued pension pot of £0 (no quid), the taxpayer is going to have to pony up the compound interest amount between now and retirement.

    So because the government decided to spend the contributions deducted from salary its tough luck on public sector workers?

    Where exactly do you think the money was spent that would have otherwise gone to the employee had they not signed up to their pension plans?

    The public has benefited from the use of public sector pension contributions being spent through short sighted planning rather than being invested, as a result the taxpayer should carry the burden.
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    RJP33 wrote: »
    Despite all the anti-Tory rhetoric (I have no idea why it's in there) you'll probably find if you compare our public services to other countries the taxpayer gets very poor value for money.

    I think you'll find we actually have very good public services compared to the vast majority of countries.

    The majority of the world's population lives in India, Latin America, Africa and China. Fancy swapping with them? No didn't think so.

    That's the problem with you people, you want first world services at third world prices. Well if you pay what you think you should pay you get India, if you pay what you are paying you get England. That's the difference.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    geneer wrote: »
    Cant say I support the public sector bleating.

    I have to say that the UK are world class Bleaters.
  • RJP33
    RJP33 Posts: 339 Forumite
    I think you'll find we actually have very good public services compared to the vast majority of countries.

    The majority of the world's population lives in India, Latin America, Africa and China. Fancy swapping with them? No didn't think so.

    That's the problem with you people, you want first world services at third world prices. Well if you pay what you think you should pay you get India, if you pay what you are paying you get England. That's the difference.

    If we're looking more realistically at other developed countries we're way behind. The problem is that there's too many people in the public service who don't offer anything and shouldn't be there, such that it’s poor value.

    Unions make it very, very difficult to change any working arrangements for the better or get rid of anyone incompetent and people get paid more on average than the private sector for relative jobs, which is absurd.

    That’s from a lot of personal experience. The upcoming tube strike is a classic example of this.
  • headcone
    headcone Posts: 536 Forumite
    ILW wrote: »
    I have to say that the UK Tory voters are world class Bleaters.

    Fixed it for you.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    RJP33 wrote: »
    If we're looking more realistically at other developed countries we're way behind. The problem is that there's too many people in the public service who don't offer anything and shouldn't be there, such that it’s poor value.

    Unions make it very, very difficult to change any working arrangements for the better or get rid of anyone incompetent and people get paid more on average than the private sector for relative jobs, which is absurd.

    That’s from a lot of personal experience. The upcoming tube strike is a classic example of this.

    Which countries? Explain yourself.
  • RJP33
    RJP33 Posts: 339 Forumite
    Which countries? Explain yourself.

    France, Germany, Japan, Canada etc. Other comparible countries with developed economies.
  • RJP33
    RJP33 Posts: 339 Forumite
    wotsthat wrote: »
    George Osborne has sent a message to everyone in the public sector that he thinks they are all s**t. Even the harshest critic of the public sector can't think everyone is s**t. Wouldn't it be more productive to get rid of those that are s**t and try not to vilify those doing a good job?

    I agree completely with this, but have you experienced it is to get rid of someone incompetent in the public sector?
  • Jimmy_31
    Jimmy_31 Posts: 2,170 Forumite
    lynzpower wrote: »
    You dont think there are any builders or plumbers working in the public sector?

    Nowhere near as many as there once was as most of the work now gets contracted out and self employed subbys like me do the work.

    I get no contract, holiday pay, sick pay or pension.
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    RJP33 wrote: »
    I agree completely with this, but have you experienced it is to get rid of someone incompetent in the public sector?

    I suppose you're right. It took forever to get rid of Gordon Brown.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.