We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Warranty ran out

1235

Comments

  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    visidigi wrote: »
    Why can't a speedo under read but it can over read? Thats not common sense, thats assumption!

    The speedo shows a speed, now that speed it displays might be 5 miles an hour above the physical actual speed.

    But the speedo and the mileage are not directly linked - the mileage is calibrated by the manufacturer based on the rolling circumference of the wheel itself, so the speed shown does not affect the milage measured.

    Just because it says I am doing 70 miles an hour does not mean I cover 70 miles, I cover the distance related to the actual speed.

    Therefore the mileage shown is accurate...

    I am not quite sure you have thought that through.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Jakg wrote: »
    On my car the over-read is done in software - the car knows exactly how fast it's going to accurately record speed / MPG / distance travelled - but for display on the speedo an over-read is added. If you drive along for a certain distance at a certain speed you'll notice you haven't travelled quite as far as you should of done...

    Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense. Who or what adds this overread?
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    There is absolutely no evidence anywhere which states that speedometers and odometers overread by at least three per cent.

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200001/ldhansrd/vo010312/text/10312w01.htm
    Speedometer Accuracy

    Lord Allen of Abbeydale asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether, in the light of the increasing importance of speed limits, they have any plans to make it easier for the private motorist to have his speedometer tested for accuracy.[HL839]

    Lord Whitty: The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, as amended, allows the use of speedometers that meet the requirements of EC Community Directive 75/443(97/39) or ECE Regulation 39. Both the EC Directive and the ECE Regulation lay down accuracy requirements to be applied at the time of vehicle approval for speedometers. These requirements are that the indicated speed must not be more than 10 per cent of the true speed plus 4 km/h. In production, however, a slightly different tolerance of 5 per cent plus 10 km/h is applied. The requirements are also that the indicated speed must never be less than the true speed.

    A vehicle meeting these requirements would not be able to travel at a greater speed than that shown on the speedometer and a driver could not, therefore, inadvertently exceed speed restrictions. Her Majesty's Government have no plans to introduce instrument tests
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    I don't see the point.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Don't see the point in what?

    Seems eminently clear to me - you made a statement, I disproved that statement. :)
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    bod1467 wrote: »
    Don't see the point in what?

    Seems eminently clear to me - you made a statement, I disproved that statement. :)

    Where have you disproved the statement?
    There is absolutely no evidence anywhere which states that speedometers and odometers overread by at least three per cent
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    edited 10 November 2011 at 1:27PM
    The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, as amended, allows the use of speedometers that meet the requirements of EC Community Directive 75/443(97/39) or ECE Regulation 39

    That's where. Can't get any better than legislation. :)

    In reality, manufacturers tend to use a targeted overstated reading then apply +/- tolerance on that, as trying to achieve a specific -0% tolerance is prohibitively expensive. (Cite: lots of online resources, such as http://www.speed-trap.co.uk/Accused_Home/Rules_useage/The_Law.htm)

    I know you'll nitpick this response, but I guess some people just HAVE to prove themselves right, even when they're wrong. :)
  • Jakg
    Jakg Posts: 2,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Zandoni wrote: »
    I'm not saying you are not correct, who knows what they can do now with the on board computers. But I do wonder if you can actually notice it, you would have to travel a long distance at a constant speed to be able to check it.

    Not really - my car has an average speed on the trip computer.

    Other owners have reported setting the cruise at 80 gives a constant 80 speed on the speedo, but it records it as an average of 75...
    Nothing I say represents any past, present or future employer.
  • Zandoni
    Zandoni Posts: 3,465 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Jakg wrote: »
    Not really - my car has an average speed on the trip computer.

    Other owners have reported setting the cruise at 80 gives a constant 80 speed on the speedo, but it records it as an average of 75...

    Doubt that proves the mileage is accurate when the speed isn't.

    bod1467, have you changed sides?
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    bod1467 wrote: »
    The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, as amended, allows the use of speedometers that meet the requirements of EC Community Directive 75/443(97/39) or ECE Regulation 39

    That's where. Can't get any better than legislation. :)

    In reality, manufacturers tend to use a targeted overstated reading then apply +/- tolerance on that, as trying to achieve a specific -0% tolerance is prohibitively expensive. (Cite: lots of online resources, such as http://www.speed-trap.co.uk/Accused_Home/Rules_useage/The_Law.htm)

    I know you'll nitpick this response, but I guess some people just HAVE to prove themselves right, even when they're wrong. :)

    But that still doesn't mean that there is any evidence to show that all speedometers are set to overread by at least three per cent, as implied by Zandoni. We all know that there are tolerances allowed by manufacturers, in accordance with the regulations, but if they were set to overread by three per cent, that would imply they have already calibrated them to 0%. Becasue that value will have to be determined, before working out what the three per cent is.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.