We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Gross mortgage lending likely to fall in 2012, says AMI
Comments
-
So you say. Yet you still appear to be spending quite a lot of time in the school yard.
Without me.
I'm grown up enough not to be pressured into answering a transparently loaded question RM.
nah nah nah ner ner (Thumbs nose at disgruntled frenemy).
No probs, geneer I thought that would be your response. You're getting rather predictable.
0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »No probs, geneer I thought that would be your response. You're getting rather predictable.

Actually RM, as I've frequently demonstrated my ability to deconstruct posters spurious arguments, you probably should have thought I'd see through your Juvenile ruse.
On the off chance that you're not really aware of what a "loaded question is" the definition can be found here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
I especially like this bit.This removes the ambiguity of the expected response, therefore nullifying the tactic. However, the askers of said questions have learned to get around this tactic by accusing the one who answers of dodging the question.
Seems like you're actually the one who is rather predictable.0 -
Actually RM, as I've frequently demonstrated my ability to deconstruct posters spurious arguments, you probably should have thought I'd see through your Juvenile ruse.
On the off chance that you're not really aware of what a "loaded question is" the definition can be found here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
I especially like this bit.
Seems like you're actually the one who is rather predictable.
Oh, I know what a loaded question is, but clearly you don't. :rotfl:0 -
Judging by the "quality" of your responses recently, I reckon you must be about 9 years old.
You don't know the half of it DervProf.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3566223
RM has outdone himself.0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »I'm just stooping down to your level dervprof. You're showing an astonishing lack of self awareness by trying to pretend you're above all this. You're the one who keeps making the snide remarks and dragging me into your sad little squabbles.
I've decided that as you keep dragging me into the schoolyard, I'd pitch it at a level you would understand, Homer.
~(_8^(|).
Well, at least you aren't getting all hysterical now, and claiming that you are being "stalked" etc. Pity your responses to my recent posts are so childish. I offer one or two "cutting" replies, and you start going on about Homer Simpson.
The thing is, you claim that I pretend to be above all of this, yet you admit that you get "dragged in" to these "sad little squabbles". It takes two to Tango. I think I am above childish name calling*, that's for sure. It seems I'm also above being banned (so far). I don't think I ever asked as to why you went AWOL for a while. What was that all about ? Must have got a bit nasty behind the scenes, I reckon.
* Except when I see an opportunity for a little play on words or a humorous comment.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards