Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Gross mortgage lending likely to fall in 2012, says AMI

Aberdeenangarse
Posts: 1,261 Forumite


Bad new for those looking to buy.
http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/economy/gross-mortgage-lending-likely-to-fall-in-2012-says-ami/1040048.article
The report says: “Insufficient equity blocks the market because tighter lending criteria mean many borrowers end up without the borrowing capacity to get a mortgage.
“Someone who bought on an 85% LTV in 2007 would now have only around 5% equity, nothing like enough to remortgage or move up the housing ladder.”
http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/economy/gross-mortgage-lending-likely-to-fall-in-2012-says-ami/1040048.article
0
Comments
-
“Someone who bought on an 85% LTV in 2007 would now have only around 5% equity, nothing like enough to remortgage or move up the housing ladder.
I think that's somewhat selective.
People that bought in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 etc. are probably in quite a good position (leaving out the years I'm not totally sure about but you get the picture).0 -
What about 1998, 1650 and 1210?
Seems quite a stupid question, but I'll attempt a response nonetheless.
1998 - Property is markably increased since then, rents have also increased in the last 13 years. Likelyhood is that the property is at least half way to being paid off. Buyers would be better off in this instance
1650 & 1210 - Very much dowbt the original purchasers are still around and quite possibly neither would the properties.
If the properties was still of sound structure and habitable, I'm sure the decendants of the buyers in 1650 & 1210 would be better off too.
Was your point that people buying in these years would not have been better off?:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
“Someone who bought on an 85% LTV in 2007 would now have only around 5% equity, nothing like enough to remortgage or move up the housing ladder.”
Even if they bought in London?0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »“Someone who bought on an 85% LTV in 2007 would now have only around 5% equity, nothing like enough to remortgage or move up the housing ladder.”
Even if they bought in London?
It's based on averages.
Articles can't highlight every single area.0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »“Someone who bought on an 85% LTV in 2007 would now have only around 5% equity, nothing like enough to remortgage or move up the housing ladder.”
Even if they bought in London?
I've just re-mortgaged a property I bought in Jan 2007.
There needed to be a valuation report to verify the LTV of the loan.
Turns out the property has increased on paper by 9.6% in that time.
Also during that time, due to a rapid repayment strategy, the property outstanding mortgage has decreased by 17.4%
Of course however the quoted line is based on averages and does not consider local applications or those reducing their outstanding debt, but it does go to highlight that falling prices restricts the market from remortgaging or moving up the ladder.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Anyone who buys in 2012 will be beter of in 25 years time.0
-
-
Anyone who buys in 2012 will be beter of in 25 years time.
My user name is derived from when I realised that overpaying your mortgage (even by a small amount) dramatically reduces both the total interest paid and the amortization period.
I would recommend that everybody overpays where they can.
It's amazing how even just a little extra goes a long way
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/mortgages/mortgage-overpayment-calculator
Overpaying £20 per month on a £100k 5% repayment mortgage would save £5,515 in interest and 1 year and 8 months.
Of course if you can increase this year on year by another £5 or £10 per month, you'll save even more and find that you will save even more interest and repay the mortgage in a an even quicker timeframe.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »My user name is derived from when I realised that overpaying your mortgage (even by a small amount) dramatically reduces both the total interest paid and the amortization period.
I would recommend that everybody overpays where they can.
It's amazing how even just a little extra goes a long way
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/mortgages/mortgage-overpayment-calculator
Overpaying £20 per month on a £100k 5% repayment mortgage would save £5,515 in interest and 1 year and 8 months.
Of course if you can increase this year on year by another £5 or £10 per month, you'll save even more and find that you will save even more interest and repay the mortgage in a an even quicker timeframe.
Totally agree. We have always bought the most expensive house we can afford and then we have always enbarked on a rigid overpayment exercise. It's worked like a dream for us and has helped us jump up the housing ladder several rungs at a time.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.7K Spending & Discounts
- 241.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 618.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176K Life & Family
- 254.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards