House prices fall £5,000 in year to September

JonnyBravo

re: assertion

Cleaver wrote: »

I swear this word is in pretty much all of your posts.

geneer wrote: »

Its quite relevant to many of the comments I respond to.

And some of the ones you make.

geneer wrote: »

Anyhow, I never linked any sites to prove my assertion about how profoundely the single seller survey has effected the Scottish market. I simply made a statement.

Good here innit?

Pimperne1

geneer wrote: »

Ah, excellent. Dropped the PG bit and gone for yet another interesting angle. I'm sure the forum is all ears.

You are of course refering to the seperate Australian forum.
Not the UK forum.

It is of course common knowledge that the oz forum trolls were punted. Indeed a few even showed up here once you and Heathcote and Rinoa announced your arrival (thread was deleted).



zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Case is already proven for PG - he is suspended in the same way that I am.

As for the other bulls being from the Australian Forum do you want to reconsider this then:

"Yet your the only bull banned from CC"

geneer

Pimperne1 wrote: »

Case is already proven for PG - he is suspended in the same way that I am.

Except of course you were banned involuntarily and PGs account was suspended at his own request.
A perfectly clear distinction.
Now stated for the fourth time.

Pimperne1 wrote: »

"Yet your the only bull banned from CC"

Fine. What I should have said was...

geneer wrote: »

Yet heres the thing.
Even in my deliberate attempts to offend, I still appear to a member of credit crunch whilst Pimperne1 seems to be the only member every to be banned from the UK forum.

Oh wait I did.

Another patented Bull exercise in pedantic banality it seems.

geneer

JonnyBravo wrote: »

re: assertion






And some of the ones you make.



Good here innit?

Well done Jonny. You appear to have proven that I do indeed know what an assertion is.

Though as I'd just posted the very definition of assertion,
that would appear to have been a bit of a pointless exercise for you.

JonnyBravo

geneer wrote: »

Though as I'd just posted the very definition of assertion,
that would appear to have been a bit of a pointless exercise for you.

Not at all. That is merely your assertion which doesn't seem to be backed up by any facts.
It's obviously more than an occasional occurence.

geneer

JonnyBravo wrote: »

Not at all. That is merely your assertion which doesn't seem to be backed up by any facts.
It's obviously more than an occasional occurence.

Actually it was a statement supported by the facts.
So it wasn't an assertion.

I'm surprise you haven't grasped the concept, given that you seen the dictionary definition and were compelled to hunt for examples of its use.

JonnyBravo

geneer wrote: »

Actually it was a statement supported by the facts.
So it wasn't an assertion.

Another assertion without facts.
Tut.
This is becoming a habit.

Even you said it only would "appear" to have been pointless. I merely eliminated your doubt by pointing out how it wasn't pointless.

HTH.

Pimperne1

geneer wrote: »

Except of course you were banned involuntarily and PGs account was suspended at his own request.
A perfectly clear distinction.
Now stated for the fourth time.





Fine. What I should have said was...



Oh wait I did.

Another patented Bull exercise in pedantic banality it seems.

Okay, I think we're there now (although without an apology I note). Both PG and I are suspended from Cc and we aren't the only ones.



For the avoidance of doubt this is what the web master says about PG:

"Fubra, the purpose behind a banning is to prevent a poster from posting messages.

If you continue to act as a proxy for PG then you become a PG user, and I will have to close your account".

heathcote123

geneer wrote: »

Nope. His account has been suspended at his specific request.
As has been clarified twice now.

He asked for it to be reopened. CC said no, so I think it's fair to say he's banned.

geneer

JonnyBravo wrote: »

Another assertion without facts.

Incorrect.

We can clearly see above the dictionary definition which I posted and refered to. Hence a statement supported by the facts.

We can also see the quote you were compelled to search for and quote. A post which clearly demonstrates my understanding of what an assertion is. Hence my statement is supported by the facts.

It really is quite simple JB.
Which does make us wonder what point you are trying to make.

Lets face it. Clearly your another bull who's "let himself fall to geneers level". And as has been happening all to often lately, you appear to have "reached geneers level" all by yourself.