House prices fall £5,000 in year to September

wotsthat

That'll confuse him.

RenovationMan

For what it's worth, I thanked that particular post because I agreed with it, not in order to try and pretend I had no part in taking this and other threads off topic with pointless arguments. I do sometimes look back at certain spats and wonder at myself for getting involved. :rotfl:

IveSeenTheLight

geneer wrote: »

:rotfl:In a way.

A comment Bizzarely thanked by RenovationMan and Iveseen the light. Both of whom have been key participants of the off topic discussions in the interim.

It seems to me as if a distinct lack of self awareness is made up by oodles of hypocricy.

LOL, I've made two previous contributions to this thread, one of which you could say was off topic.

You've made 31 posts to this thread.

Have a look at your contribution in those posts and determine if they are on or off topic.

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

P.S. I didn't thank the thread you refer to. Once again you get your facts wrong.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=47969765&postcount=108

geneer

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

LOL, I've made two previous contributions to this thread, one of which you could say was off topic.

You've made 31 posts to this thread.

Have a look at your contribution in those posts and determine if they are on or off topic.

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

They are off topic light. As are the numerous posters I'm responding too.
But then I'm not thanking people for pointing this out.
You understand what a hypocrite is right?
RenovationMan seems to have figured it out.

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

P.S. I didn't thank the thread you refer to. Once again you get your facts wrong.

Once again your assertions are devoid of facts.
Because I was clearly refering to the post quoted in my comment.
And lo and behold look who's thanked it. If it isn't IveSeenTheLight.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=47984409&postcount=113

Cleaver

geneer wrote: »

assertion

I swear this word is in pretty much all of your posts.

Pimperne1

geneer wrote: »

No. Your account was suspended involuntarily.

I would have thought this distinction would have been clear, given the fact that PGs voluntary request to have his account suspended has been repeated three times now.

There appear to be quite a few Australians "banned" too, did you miss this (any apology likely for lying)?

Hey, advertising seems to have taken a bit of a dip over in Cc nowadays.

Do you think the "creative" count of visitors on the main forum page is likely to convince potential advertisers that the visitors through the site is as high as that? Does Cc really think that they will believe ten times as many people visit the site to look when the members can't even be bothered to visit to post! Visitor numbers, albeit supposedly for the previous 90 minutes, hasn't been below 50 all day (and a quick look at the forums indicate that the numbers are probably something like 50 less than that) :beer:

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

You understand what a hypocrite is right?
RenovationMan seems to have figured it out.

Easy peasy, I just read some of your posts. You're the King of the hypocrites, geneer.

geneer

Cleaver wrote: »

I swear this word is in pretty much all of your posts.

Its quite relevant to many of the comments I respond to.

as·ser·tion ( -sûr sh n). n. 1. The act of asserting. 2. Something declared or stated positively, often with no support or attempt at proof

geneer

RenovationMan wrote: »

Easy peasy, I just read some of your posts. You're the King of the hypocrites, geneer.

That would be one of those "assertions" RM.

geneer

Pimperne1 wrote: »

There appear to be quite a few Australians "banned" too, did you miss this (any apology likely for lying)?

Ah, excellent. Dropped the PG bit and gone for yet another interesting angle. I'm sure the forum is all ears.

You are of course refering to the seperate Australian forum.
Not the UK forum.

It is of course common knowledge that the oz forum trolls were punted. Indeed a few even showed up here once you and Heathcote and Rinoa announced your arrival (thread was deleted).

Pimperne1 wrote: »

Hey, advertising seems to have taken a bit of a dip over in Cc nowadays.

Do you think the "creative" count of visitors on the main forum page is likely to convince potential advertisers that the visitors through the site is as high as that? Does Cc really think that they will believe ten times as many people visit the site to look when the members can't even be bothered to visit to post! Visitor numbers, albeit supposedly for the previous 90 minutes, hasn't been below 50 all day (and a quick look at the forums indicate that the numbers are probably something like 50 less than that) :beer:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz