We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pitfalls of zero rate interest credit cards
Comments
-
-
chattychappy wrote: »Er... I did. And then you wrote the above.
Not very logical.
It was you who said it was the company's fault in your previous post, along with an obscure reference to Cluedo. (Perhaps not logical or too logical?)
I will say for the third time that it is not the company's fault for the rule but it is being very severe in applying these rule for such a mistake.0 -
It was you who said it was the company's fault in your previous post, along with an obscure reference to Cluedo. (Perhaps not logical or too logical?)
Looks like you missed the irony in:chattychappy wrote: »Yep, it was the banker's fault.
And there was me thinking it was Col Mustard with the lead piping.0 -
chattychappy wrote: »Looks like you missed the irony in:
You are still missing the point that the Halifax is not operating in a fair manner with someone who had made a genuine mistake, which could not gain them any possible advantage. You are using this situation to make cheap points with your very clever, "irony."0 -
Because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they are missing your point.0
-
You are still missing the point that the Halifax is not operating in a fair manner with someone who had made a genuine mistake, which could not gain them any possible advantage. You are using this situation to make cheap points with your very clever, "irony."
Your point has been well heard and understood.
It's just erroneous, that's all.Cashback Earned ¦ Nectar Points £68 ¦ Natoinwide Select £62 ¦ Aqua Reward £100 ¦ Amex Platinum £48
0 -
Somebody I know well......The point I was trying to make was that the severe punishment did not fit the crime.This person who did this made a simple mistake............someone who had made a genuine mistake, which could not gain them any possible advantage.
Why do you get so worked-up about something that happened to "somebody you know" (well or otherwise)?
God forbid - One could think, it happened to you!
0 -
bengal-stripe wrote: »God forbid - One could think, it happened to you!
Oh... a bluff! So it is Cluedo.... My bet is it happened in the conservatory.0 -
bengal-stripe wrote: »Why do you get so worked-up about something that happened to "somebody you know" (well or otherwise)?
God forbid - One could think, it happened to you!
In this case one would be absolutely and completely wrong. I do get involved when somebody I know has suffered a bit. As mentioned earlier I am honest.0 -
chattychappy wrote: »Oh... a bluff! So it is Cluedo.... My bet is it happened in the conservatory.
As I said, I am an honest man, who was looking for some help and guidance perhaps and not a bunch of smart alec remarks.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards