Nationwide +0.1% MoM -0.3% YoY

geneer

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

It's clear you don;t like discussing facts

Hmmmmm. Yet the facts behind my interest in your choices have been made clear.

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

My my, how pedantic.
When I was "enhancing the understanding" it was beacuse we were discussing the topic of the thread. It was originally generated because Graham chose the wrong column.

NEvermind, one day you'll follor a thread and topic

Of course by pedantic you mean accurate.

IveSeenTheLight

geneer wrote: »

Of course by pedantic you mean accurate.

Of course not.
Your becoming increasingly childish in your retorts.

You started a very refreshing thread on debt stats.
It's definately refreshing when you link / post facts to discuss.

Sadly it's in the minority.

geneer

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

Of course not.
Your becoming increasingly childish in your retorts.

You started a very refreshing thread on debt stats.
It's definately refreshing when you link / post facts to discuss.

Sadly it's in the minority.

I don't see whats childish about clearly setting out and reitterating
my original premise, providing clear evidence for the same.

Of course generating ad hominem attacks simply because you do not like the facts being put to you is indeed intensely childish.
As is the compulsion to generate page after page of "discussion" simply to throw as much smoke as you can on your original error or hypocricy.
Sadly, for you, its in the majority.

IveSeenTheLight

geneer wrote: »

I don't see whats childish about clearly setting out and reitterating
my original premise, providing clear evidence for the same.

Of course generating ad hominem attacks simply because you do not like the facts being put to you is indeed intensely childish.
As is the compulsion to generate page after page of "discussion" simply to throw as much smoke as you can on your original error or hypocricy.
Sadly, for you, its in the majority.

I love facts and always happily link them.
that way it's transparent and open for interrogation.
Something I won't shy away from.

Stick to facts and we'll all happily debate the data.

geneer

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

I love facts and always happily link them.
that way it's transparent and open for interrogation.
Something I won't shy away from.

Stick to facts and we'll all happily debate the data.

Yet I've demonstrated the facts related to the bias you apply to two different sources of data.

And all you've done is spit the dummy and try to generate as much electronic "smoke" as you can. Not exactly transparent.

Sadly you are all to willing to shy away from your own failings.

One of your favoured tactics is grinding repitition of unsubstantiated assertions like the above.

I say unsubstantiated, but what I mean is openly discredited by your own actions. Or is it another lite on another thread researching the words to the Cuckoo song. :rotfl:

IveSeenTheLight

geneer wrote: »

Yet I've demonstrated the facts .....:rotfl:

LOL, that's funny

geneer

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

LOL, that's funny

I found the facts quite amusing too.
Which is why I raised them.