We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

S.A.D lights/clock from £15 delivered.. don't let the winter blues get you this year!

124»

Comments

  • bcl999
    bcl999 Posts: 3,620 Forumite
    fleur365 wrote: »
    I got a portable lamp from boots earlier this year and started using it end Jan, I think it made a big difference to me as I didn't suffer from my usual fed up state throughout the winter x

    This is what I find with mine. I can't say POSITIVELY that it works but I seem to get an awful lot more done instead of just moping around.
  • EmH
    EmH Posts: 330 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 24 September 2011 at 12:22AM
    cootambear wrote: »
    SAD is middle class Bipolar II

    You would be far better off with a mood stabiliser (not the same as an anti depressant), than a lamp.

    I'm very dubious of your claim as bipolar is a year round condition and S.A.D. is, well, seasonal! Where's the research on which you are basing the claim please?

    Perhaps you can also explain why someone diagnosed with bipolar II and stable on mood stabilisers for most of the year gets S.A.D. symptoms in winter but finds that a S.A.D. lamp is of great benefit in treating them? If S.A.D. is just bipolar then the mood stabilisers should continue to work and no change in mood should occur in winter.

    If more than one form of therapy works, use them all. Healthy diet, exercise, light therapy and medication where necessary/appropriate.

    We're all exposed to enough chemicals these days as it is, why voluntarily take more, perhaps unnecessarily, when light therapy could help? Mood stabilisers can have far more nasty side effects than light therapy, and there's the cost of prescriptions, (both to the individual and to the NHS), and the cost of the regular GP's appointments someone on mood stabilisers will need. I say try light therapy, diet and exercise first!

    May contain nuts
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.