We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Advice On Buying A Printer?
Comments
-
OK, even at A4 they want £1:20, which is easily £1 per print more than printing at home
I might do my shopping online0 -
OK, even at A4 they want £1:20, which is easily £1 per print more than printing at home
I might do my shopping online
Ok so your printer is a decent higher end machine which is designed for the job (unlike newer low end Epsons) try the same equasion on a HP printer that takes 300 series cartridges and I think you will find it's far cheaper and better to use the machines in the supermarkets. Also an even bigger con is the HP photo machines that print 6 x 4 photos, cost of the ink cartridge is £22 and HP claim 55 photos (if you're lucky)I hate football and do wish people wouldn't keep talking about it like it's the most important thing in the world0 -
OK, even at A4 they want £1:20, which is easily £1 per print more than printing at home
I might do my shopping online
Yet again, not a common denominator. I'm not saying people don't blow up their prints, but most people would settle for standard 6x4 prints, especially for things like holiday snaps, etc... and these are very cheap at the photo kiosks.
You seem to be missing out the initial costs to acquire the hardware in the first place never mind the costs to run it.
My original point was that i've realised that my printing habits in a realistic scenario have meant that I don't need a printer at home because it's a lot more cost effective to use other options.0 -
Brian_The_Lion wrote: »Yet again, not a common denominator. I'm not saying people don't blow up their prints, but most people would settle for standard 6x4 prints, especially for things like holiday snaps, etc... and these are very cheap at the photo kiosks.
Correct, most people don't want A4 photos, just maybe the odd one, most of the time it's 6 x 4 holiday snaps and they don't have fancy higher end printers they just have £30 HP machines with pathetic capacity cartridges so their printing costs if they do it themselves is very high.I hate football and do wish people wouldn't keep talking about it like it's the most important thing in the world0 -
all the talk if going to the supermarket to print etc has nothing to do with the op does it? i thought the op was looking for a suggestion for a multifunction printer that doesn't need to be good for printing photos....This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
the_r_sole wrote: »all the talk if going to the supermarket to print etc has nothing to do with the op does it? i thought the op was looking for a suggestion for a multifunction printer that doesn't need to be good for printing photos....
OK:
Canon MG5150 or MG5250 if you need WiFi, no contest far better than any other machine in the price band. Both are quality machines with top and bottom paper feed, decent capacity cartridges, reasonably cheap OEM, cheep refill/compatibles accessable print head meaning it can be soaked in Di-Ionised water should it clogg, this is far better and cheaper than running countless expensive head cleaning cycles, all the other machines have print heads buried in the machine except the HP Photosmart (364 series cartridges) machines but The HP machines are very poor quality for the money.I hate football and do wish people wouldn't keep talking about it like it's the most important thing in the world0 -
The only complaint thus far over my Kodak printer is that it's a little sluggish printing wise but the inks are cheap, quality is acceptable and the printer itself was reasonably priced (£40) - compared with the old Lexmark it's quicker, about 20% the price of the cartidges, nowhere near as thirsty & has a card reader, there is also a wifi version available.Retired member - fed up with the general tone of the place.0
-
Currently I would recommend a Canon. Use one myself, much better than the Epson it replaced that was a inkaholic.
Test a year or so back on gadget Show, the Canon's came out on top for cost per print on inkjets.0 -
Thanks everyone for the advice, interestesting to read the suggestions on my query.
Thanks for the links too...:)
Have a great weekend! X0 -
the_r_sole wrote: »all the talk if going to the supermarket to print etc has nothing to do with the op does it? i thought the op was looking for a suggestion for a multifunction printer that doesn't need to be good for printing photos....
As this is MONEYSAVINGEXPERT sometimes it's helpful to suggest ways of saving money. Just because you a) have a printer or b) want a printer doesnt necessarily mean you need one.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards