We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The media and poor grammar

Options
24

Comments

  • Daytona_nev
    Daytona_nev Posts: 1,431 Forumite
    Yep, i defo agree i do, the way potato's is spelt n' stuff. I wish the teacher's would learn the kids better in school.
  • Anwen_2
    Anwen_2 Posts: 234 Forumite
    Expresso is WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. It has been pressed = espresso. Expresso implies that it is fast. Another one that bugs me is panini's. Firstly, argh at the apostrophe. Secondly, panini is already plural! And thirdly, actually, panino just means bread roll or sandwich, it isn't a type of bread.
    DFW stats:
    Currently under review


    Proud to be dealing with my debts
  • katy2
    katy2 Posts: 148 Forumite
    Not only grammar, does anyone else get frustrated at the poor pronunciation broadcasters use?

    A couple that really annoy me, instead of us ,uzz. Particularly at the end of the news, 'that's all from uzz'.

    Also instead of going to be, gunnabee.
  • Jay-Jay_4
    Jay-Jay_4 Posts: 7,351 Forumite
    well per'aps if some-body would borrow me a gramma book I wouldnt' have to lend one from the library. and if some-body could learn me the basic rools of gramma I wouldn't spell things rong all the time :mad:


    My other half's Mum says lend/borrow and learn/teach the wrong way around. She firmly believes that it is her dialect, refuses to listen to reason, and often confuses our 5 year old. At least she laughs about it when we take the p!ss :D

    I wish that my punctuation and spelling were up to scratch, unfortunately I spent my school days shopping in Manchester and so missed out on quite a lot of english lessons. I'm quite embarrassed if I get something wrong and I've tried to teach myself how to correctly use punctuation but at least I don't write for a job..... so most of the time I can get away with it.

    What really bugz me is txt spk wen u cant tell wt the othr persn is tryin to say bcoz they use words like cul8tz
    Just run, run and keep on running!

  • pickle
    pickle Posts: 611 Forumite
    Quite right but [/B]I think that a quick note on the internet is not quite the same as writing for a newspaper. I didn't know that in the last ten years that it had become acceptable to write poorly, obviously at the age of 38 I'm well past it and should be put out to pasture. I'm not claiming to be perfect with my grammar but I do expect that professional writers would have the basics covered. I, on the other hand, am not paid to write for a living.
  • pickle
    pickle Posts: 611 Forumite
    Don't know what happened with all the bold type?!
  • Sofa_Sogood
    Sofa_Sogood Posts: 5,258 Forumite
    So far I have spotted 9 grammatical and/or spelling mistakes in the responses on this thread (including the OP). :D

    On the other hand you only have to look at the pile of hacks that write for most of the rags we are expected to read to find that many are barely literate and don't speak proper english like wot I does.

    Ivan

    By the way Ivan, 9 should be typed as nine :D
  • IvanOpinion
    IvanOpinion Posts: 22,136 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    By the way Ivan, 9 should be typed as nine :D
    Just another 'by the way' the number '9' and the word 'nine' should be surrounded by apostrophes within your response! ;)

    It depends on whether you are using traditional pre-georgian grammar which derives from latin semantics, in which case the number should be spelt out in full, or post-georgian where a more modern approach was taken to grammar and the inclusion of numbers was deemed to be acceptable (amongst other changes to the language and its semantics). I believe that this did involve a royal decree. If memory serves me right it was something to do with the inclusion of numerics within the bible. During Victorian times there was an attempt to revert back to the original semantics of the English language. Strangely enough this was started by some archbishop (I can not remember which one), who was bit of zealot, and thought that any deviation from the semantics used within the bible was blasphemous. He appealed directly to Queen Victoria to get this changed back but she bowed to the wishes of her royal advisors - I think she was basically allowing some form of natural progression to take place within the language. Can you imagine it, we would be back to speaking with words like 'thou', 'thee' and 'thy'.

    Hopefully that puts everything into context.
    Ivan
    I don't care about your first world problems; I have enough of my own!
  • Sofa_Sogood
    Sofa_Sogood Posts: 5,258 Forumite
    Just another 'by the way' the number '9' and the word 'nine' should be surrounded by apostrophes within your response! ;)

    It depends on whether you are using traditional pre-georgian grammar which derives from latin semantics, in which case the number should be spelt out in full, or post-georgian where a more modern approach was taken to grammar and the inclusion of numbers was deemed to be acceptable (amongst other changes to the language and its semantics). I believe that this did involve a royal decree. If memory serves me right it was something to do with the inclusion of numerics within the bible. During Victorian times there was an attempt to revert back to the original semantics of the English language. Strangely enough this was started by some archbishop (I can not remember which one), who was bit of zealot, and thought that any deviation from the semantics used within the bible was blasphemous. He appealed directly to Queen Victoria to get this changed back but she bowed to the wishes of her royal advisors - I think she was basically allowing some form of natural progression to take place within the language. Can you imagine it, we would be back to speaking with words like 'thou', 'thee' and 'thy'.

    Hopefully that puts everything into context.
    Ivan

    Wow, a lesson in English and history :D

    Didn't know about the apostrophes either :o Thanks.

    Thee's a clever person ;) (Or is it 'thy's?)
  • YorkshireBoy
    YorkshireBoy Posts: 31,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ...He appealed directly to Queen Victoria to get this changed back but she bowed to the wishes of her royal advisors - I think she was basically allowing some form of natural progression to take place within the language. Can you imagine it, we would be back to speaking with words like 'thou', 'thee' and 'thy'...Ivan

    Blimey, up here in Yorkshire we'd heard that she changed her mind back again. For the last 110 years we've enthusiastically adopted these words - note the following examples...

    "Wassup wi' THEE?".

    "It's THY turn for a go".

    We even invented a few more, such as...

    "THA can't do that", and "THAS no chance".

    I'm going to spread the word that we can stop now, and speak proper, like what the others do.

    YB
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.