breach of compromise agreement by employer.

mildred1978

Milkshock wrote: »

A shame

and i thought you as a legal professional would have the ability to take each issue on its merits and not allow your opinions of said specific issues to be coloured by your general opinion of the person raising them.

that would after all be legally ethical, wouldnt it?

You're not paying her to be 'legally ethical'!* :rotfl:

Why don't you trust the solicitor you're using?

*whatever that means!

Milkshock

Bobl wrote: »

Quite a climb down from your earlier guarantee of a new backdated agreement enabling you to take legal action against them. They are obviously not as stupid as you think.

So whilst this ensures any future initial reference will stick to the agreement, any request for additional information, around disciplinary action etc, will be rejected by you which for me would ring alarm bells.

However, you have what you wanted in the first place so that in itself is a positive.

rejected by me? do you mean by them?

they are going to pay me compensation anyway so I don't mind the backdated element at this point.

Milkshock

mildred1978 wrote: »

You're not paying her to be 'legally ethical'!* :rotfl:

Why don't you trust the solicitor you're using?

*whatever that means!

you know what i mean

and i just like others opinions thats all.

saintjammyswine

What right have you got to be demanding other people be legally ethical when I have spent the last week looking at posts from you about how you are trying to screw over a previous employer who you got sacked from for the most petty, immature and ridiculous reasons? You have employed a solicitor, either trust their advice or get another one. Why do you want other opinions? Are you waiting until the one you agree with turns up and you will trust that opinion?

Milkshock

saintjammyswine wrote: »

What right have you got to be demanding other people be legally ethical when I have spent the last week looking at posts from you about how you are trying to screw over a previous employer who you got sacked from for the most petty, immature and ridiculous reasons? You have employed a solicitor, either trust their advice or get another one. Why do you want other opinions? Are you waiting until the one you agree with turns up and you will trust that opinion?

who got sacked?

because whoever you are thinking of, it wasnt me.

saintjammyswine

Oh whatever, sue me.

Milkshock

saintjammyswine wrote: »

Oh whatever, sue me.

if it stops me from gaining employment - i would sue you, yes.

Milkshock

saintjammyswine wrote: »

What right have you got to be demanding other people be legally ethical when I have spent the last week looking at posts from you about how you are trying to screw over a previous employer who you got sacked from for the most petty, immature and ridiculous reasons? You have employed a solicitor, either trust their advice or get another one. Why do you want other opinions? Are you waiting until the one you agree with turns up and you will trust that opinion?

and thats the real reason why im bothered, because i dont feel the issues in themselves warranted the kind of action that was taken. as they were as you rightly claim, petty. not then, and certainly not now when im trying to rebuild my career.

saintjammyswine

Then stop bleating on here and use the saved energy to rebuild it.

mjm3346

Milkshock wrote: »

If approached by any prospective employer, company or agency requesting additional information or requesting a reference in a different format to that agreed at Schedule 2, the Employer confirms they will contact the Employee for confirmation that he is happy for the information to be provided.

Dear Mr Prospective employer,

thank you for your request for information regarding the past conduct of Mr Milkshock. Under the terms of a compromise agreement I cannot release any further information without his consent, I have written to him today and will contact you again when I have his response.

Yours etc.

Last Boss.

---

Dear Last Boss

Thank you for your response which tells us all we need to know, we have found a more suitable candidate/the job is no longer available/etc so we do not need any further information on Mr Milkshock.

etc.