breach of compromise agreement by employer.

Milkshock

saintjammyswine wrote: »

You have been told they are NOT spent. It is not 3 points on your licence or a D&D charge.

hang on im not querying if they are ever 'spent' or not.

im looking for what kind of official response that i could legitimately ask from the employer to this question of alleged disciplinaries, that would not arose suspicion from a new employer, given that the disciplinary is not on file.

if i asked them to officially say 'there are no records of any disciplinaries on file' and no more, i dont think they would be lying, and it would allow me to start a new job even in the face of 3rd party allegations. certinaly it would be a hell of an improvement over 'no comment'

saintjammyswine

Why dont you take this much time and effort in not getting in fights with colleagues and keeping your job? really, let go and move on.

Milkshock

saintjammyswine wrote: »

Why dont you take this much time and effort in not getting in fights with colleagues and keeping your job? really, let go and move on.

you know thats what i really want to do

i just dont want my ex employer being in a position where they can sabotage a future job for me.

this whole process is about enabling me to move on

saintjammyswine

THEY ARE NOT SABOTAGING ANYTHING, YOU DID THAT BY TWATTING A COLLEAGUE. Why not simply move on?

Jarndyce

saintjammyswine wrote: »

Why dont you take this much time and effort in not getting in fights with colleagues and keeping your job? really, let go and move on.

If we all stopped feeding him we would all be able to move on!

saintjammyswine

Jarndyce wrote: »

If we all stopped feeding him we would all be able to move on!

I know but you just get sucked in!

Milkshock

ok i know youve all been dying for an update and the text of the letter that the former employer was going to give me.

remember - no claim has as yet been put forward to former employer, but on the basis of what ive been told in it, im of a mind to take it to them, and ask them to justify what happened to me in my job fiasco in light of the CA and the comments they have made to me now.


Further to our recent conversation, I write to confirm that in the event that prospective employers seek a reference in respect of Milkshock, relevant staff will only provide the reference attached to the compromise agreement and will not volunteer any other information.

I cannot agree to "deny" the existence of the warning or the circumstances relating to it but if the organisation is asked direct questions about it, it will decline to answer, unless required by law.

We will send copies of any reference we send out to Milkshock at the same time as we send it; I am not prepared to agree to Milkshock's request to record any other communications and email them to him. I will however impress upon staff the need to keep the circumstances of the compromise agreement confidential.

I'm assuming the circumstances surrounding the CA mean the pending issue that was outstanding before I left, and which is referenced in the background section of the CA.

SarEl

And I think by this stahe the answer is - "do we care?". Do whatever the hell you want.

Milkshock

SarEl wrote: »

And I think by this stahe the answer is - "do we care?". Do whatever the hell you want.

Well I got what I want - at least part of it - by perseverance, when you said they were in the clear and could screw me over as they wished.

with all due respect SarEl, although i do respect your knowledge of law, for a site that supposedly represents the consumer in 'cutting their costs and fighting their corner', your posts are very much on the side of the employer and give little or no confidence in the individual to take on questionable actions, when with a bit of know-how they can beat the employer at their own game.

SarEl

Milkshock wrote: »

Well I got what I want - at least part of it - by perseverance, when you said they were in the clear and could screw me over as they wished.

with all due respect SarEl, although i do respect your knowledge of law, for a site that supposedly represents the consumer in 'cutting their costs and fighting their corner', your posts are very much on the side of the employer and give little or no confidence in the individual to take on questionable actions, when with a bit of know-how they can beat the employer at their own game.

Assuming we believe a word you say - which I for one don't. So again - do we care?