The "have a look at this!" thread II

StumpyPumpy

lauraland wrote: »

hmmm it is a bit violent isn't it? looks a bit like Lindsay Lohan. Gorgeous house though, I think I'd weep with joy on a daily basis if I lived somewhere as beautiful.

Yep - it is LiLo
http://www.celebuzz.com/2011-08-15/lindsay-lohan-poses-with-bloody-knife-for-tyler-shields-photos/

SP

michaels

mumoftwins wrote: »

What on earth is going on in the picture on the wall in Pic 2?

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-41722391.html

I guess that's what makes a 4 bed semi worth 155k more (580k) than a 4 bed detached on the same road sold for in January (415k).

Strapped

Metranil_Vavin wrote: »

Firstly the price..although it is Primrose Hill North London so eye wateringly expensive, but secondly...well judge for yourself! :rotfl:

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-25120596.html

Expensive brothel?

namecheck

mumoftwins wrote: »

What on earth is going on in the picture on the wall in Pic 2?

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-41722391.html

Weird, but at least it's not a fixture.

I think the house looks quite nice, although I was disappointed when the pics of the garden turned up. Quite a let-down, so I expect that is why the EA left them till last.

polkadot90

fionajbanana wrote: »

What is wrong with people that have 95%+ of their decor all black, all white or all grey?

It makes things so depressing.

I suspect it's because they believe it makes their d!cor superior to all us mere mortals that have colour filled abodes.

Davesnave

namecheck wrote: »

Weird, but at least it's not a fixture.

I think the house looks quite nice, although I was disappointed when the pics of the garden turned up. Quite a let-down, so I expect that is why the EA left them till last.

It's art, innit? Art's meant to be challenging nowadays. You can't just stick 'The Haywain' on the wall in your lounge; it's far too relaxing.

I thought the same thing about the garden, which is where the artistic flair ended, apparently. Needs a few statement plants!

Davesnave

Here's a cracker of a repo which won't tax you too much, as the only piccie of note is the first one:

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-27098370.html

From experience, these agents have always been dozy. They're just following their usual sausage-machine approach by putting the front view first.

Davesnave

chessiex wrote: »

I suspect it's because they believe it makes their d!cor superior to all us mere mortals that have colour filled abodes.

What the heck is wrong with the word 'd e c o r' ?

I've noticed before that MSE's swear filter doesn't like it, but I've checked and there's no clue in my dictionary. Is there an underground meaning I've been blissfully unaware of?

If so...d!cor, d!cor d!cor, d!cor.... DECOR!!!!

There, I've said it in public now, and I don't care if you're all offended!!! :rotfl:

GDB2222

Davesnave wrote: »

Here's a cracker of a repo which won't tax you too much, as the only piccie of note is the first one:

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-27098370.html

From experience, these agents have always been dozy. They're just following their usual sausage-machine approach by putting the front view first.

I must be dim, but I can't see what's wrong with it? I'm amazed those trees aren't causing subsidence, but if they aren't, what's the prob?

Davesnave

GDB2222 wrote: »

I must be dim, but I can't see what's wrong with it? I'm amazed those trees aren't causing subsidence, but if they aren't, what's the prob?

Just the presentation by the agents. The first photo is supposed to matter, but this one doesn't present the property in a good light or even inform very much.

A bit of an arborist's wet dream though! :rotfl: