The "have a look at this!" thread II

bouicca21

And you might have thought that the EA would mention that this magnificent beautifully restored etc house just happens to be on the South Circular. The EA is right about the pubs though.

System

NaughtiusMaximus wrote: »

After clicking on the map view and zooming out, I'm concerned there may be a risk of flooding here.

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-51722304.html

On zooming out, it looks like the EA put the property on latitude 0 and longitude 0

moneyistooshorttomention

Davesnave wrote: »

The whole thing looks as if it was shot on an old phone, so maybe I'm wrong, but I'm picking up subtle changes of shade in the ceilings and on some of the walls, which suggests unevenness. It could be dirt on the walls, though. The whole thing just doesn't look as crisp as it should.

Pics 7 & 9 for example.

Ah....see what you mean. Didnt have to have a very close peer at the ceiling to think "Yikes!".

moneyistooshorttomention

bouicca21 wrote: »

I think is one of those 'if you have to ask, you can't afford it' cases
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-51666258.html

Wondering which it was that did for the owner wishing to keep the place first actually out of that aforementioned heating bill or, on the other hand, all those stairs everywhere! You wouldn't need a gym membership to keep fit if you lived there.

Davesnave

ScarletMarble wrote: »

On zooming out, it looks like the EA put the property on latitude 0 and longitude 0

It's the default.

For a while, Webbers EA in my area were doing this on all their properties, but I don't know what the reasoning was behind it. As some were country houses, I thought it could have been to discourage drive-bys, but as they often included the road name with town property, it wasn't exactly an intellectual challenge, finding those. Indeed, a bit of Googling usually worked for the others too.

Although I can understand people being annoyed if their Street View pics were taken on dustbin day, or whatever, it wouldn't really justify trying to hide the property. Hiding things is never a great way to advertise them.

System

moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »

Wondering which it was that did for the owner wishing to keep the place first actually out of that aforementioned heating bill or, on the other hand, all those stairs everywhere! You wouldn't need a gym membership to keep fit if you lived there.

There is a lift. Though that may increase the POA by £2m

badger09

bouicca21 wrote: »

I think is one of those 'if you have to ask, you can't afford it' cases
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-51666258.html

If you click on 'see more properties like this one', there aren't any (now there's a surprise:cool:) but the price range is £3,000,000 to £4,000,000:eek:

martinsurrey

badger09 wrote: »

If you click on 'see more properties like this one', there aren't any (now there's a surprise:cool:) but the price range is £3,000,000 to £4,000,000:eek:

its listed at exactly £3.5m

search se19+5miles 3 beds+ £3-4m and its on page 4 between 2 £3.5m properties

Dandie89

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-70210757.html
An easy spot the dog. Just look to the best seat in the house

Dandie89

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-62817589.html
Another spot the dog doing its very best to help sell this rather elegant apartment assisted by a magnificent effort by the agent in mountaineering allusions.