PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Council flat dilemma

124»

Comments

  • Beckyy
    Beckyy Posts: 2,833 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Does your ex want the flat back at all?
  • I would be careful listening to some of this advice, if you stop paying rent and end up with a CCJ you may be denied credit in future. I would not want a tennant that had to be evicted through the courts from their last place.
    Look at a HMO or sharing with a landlord, as others say above. Its cheaper and will allow you to save- maybe to buy at some point.
    Age is irrelevant... one of my tennants is 49 and quite happy sharing with 2 other people. He is also saving to buy after a change of circumstances.
  • squinty
    squinty Posts: 573 Forumite
    Johnfinch wrote: »
    Hi

    Does anyone have any idea of what could happen?

    Cheers

    John,

    The tenancy is in the name of your ex. She has illegally sub-let the flat to you and you have no right to remain.

    The issue about paying the rent is largely irrelevent. By not occupying te flat as her only or principal home she has boiken the terms of the tenancy and despite what others have implied the council can quickly take action to gain possession. You have no legal claim.

    Mickey54 is wrong about the tenancy - you have explained the tenancy is in her sole name, and a secure tenancy cannot be assigned apart from in a few situations that are prescribed in law. None of which apply in your case (If you were a joint tenant things would be different)

    The council could speak to your ex and ask her to surrender the tenancy, they could then get you out in a matter of days.

    If this involves taking you to court, the council could seek to recover all costs from you.

    I realise this is not what you want to hear, but I want to make it clear that things could move quickly

    I strongly recommend that you start to look for alternatives now. If there is a Housing Aid Centre locally they may point you in the right direction. Otherwise some councils do operate bond schemes to help with deposits. Also, you could try the council for getting your own flat - demand for council accommodation, especially flats, varies considerably across the country so this may not be possible.

    Good luck
  • mickey54
    mickey54 Posts: 383 Forumite
    squinty wrote: »
    John,

    The tenancy is in the name of your ex. She has illegally sub-let the flat to you and you have no right to remain.

    The issue about paying the rent is largely irrelevent. By not occupying te flat as her only or principal home she has boiken the terms of the tenancy and despite what others have implied the council can quickly take action to gain possession. You have no legal claim.

    Mickey54 is wrong about the tenancy - you have explained the tenancy is in her sole name, and a secure tenancy cannot be assigned apart from in a few situations that are prescribed in law. None of which apply in your case (If you were a joint tenant things would be different)

    The council could speak to your ex and ask her to surrender the tenancy, they could then get you out in a matter of days.

    If this involves taking you to court, the council could seek to recover all costs from you.

    I realise this is not what you want to hear, but I want to make it clear that things could move quickly

    I strongly recommend that you start to look for alternatives now. If there is a Housing Aid Centre locally they may point you in the right direction. Otherwise some councils do operate bond schemes to help with deposits. Also, you could try the council for getting your own flat - demand for council accommodation, especially flats, varies considerably across the country so this may not be possible.

    Good luck

    ouncil tenancies
    Council tenancies can only be passed on once by succession or assignment. For example, after one joint tenant dies and her/his rights are transferred to the surviving joint tenant by succession, it will not be possible for the tenancy to be assigned to anyone else.

    If there has been no previous succession or assignment, secure council tenants can only assign their tenancy to certain people - no one else will qualify. The only people who you may be able to assign your tenancy to are:

    your spouse or registered civil partner, as long as s/he is living with you
    another member of your family (this includes cohabiting partners, children, parents, siblings and most other close relatives), as long the person you want to assign the tenancy to has been living with you for at least one year.

    The OP is/was a co-habitee. Tenant is not sub-letting..he was already there as a Qualifying Occupier.

    Also - very similar conditions in Scotland - if OP is from there!!!
  • squinty
    squinty Posts: 573 Forumite
    Mickey,

    Sorry, but I think you are wrong.

    I understand you argument that s91 (3) (c) (1985 Housing Act) allows an assignment to someone who is qualified to succeed, but the OP is not qualified to suceed.

    i.e. S.87 lists who is qualified to succeed, either spouse or civil partner (which does not apply as tenant was GF) or other member of family who have resided with tenancy for past 12 months (OP is not a fammily member, nor have they lived together for past 12 months)

    Not familiar with Scottish Law, but think the Scottish secure tenacy actually makes this much easier.
  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,729 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If OP is from Scotland it appears the tenancy MAY be assigned to him see..
    http://scotland.shelter.org.uk/getadvice/advice_topics/renting_rights/council,_housing_association_and_housing_co-op_tenancies/your_rights_as_a_scottish_secure_tenant#8
    You can sign over your tenancy to anyone who has lived with you and has used the property as their main home for the past six months or more. This is called assignation.

    But if he is in bonnie Scotland I hope the council can find reasons not to..

    Cheers!
  • If OP is from Scotland it appears the tenancy MAY be assigned to him see..
    http://scotland.shelter.org.uk/getadvice/advice_topics/renting_rights/council,_housing_association_and_housing_co-op_tenancies/your_rights_as_a_scottish_secure_tenant#8



    But if he is in bonnie Scotland I hope the council can find reasons not to..

    Cheers!
    Why do you hope??
  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,729 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Why do you hope??

    I hope that a prospective, waiting tenant who has followed the processes and abided by the rules gets the place rather than this gentleman, who appears by his behaviour for some months to have no interest in sticking to such rules. Apologies for being blunt but that's my view, others may hold differing views.

    Cheers, and best wishes to all, including those who disagree with me..!
  • mickey54
    mickey54 Posts: 383 Forumite
    squinty wrote: »
    Mickey,

    Sorry, but I think you are wrong.

    I understand you argument that s91 (3) (c) (1985 Housing Act) allows an assignment to someone who is qualified to succeed, but the OP is not qualified to suceed.

    i.e. S.87 lists who is qualified to succeed, either spouse or civil partner (which does not apply as tenant was GF) or other member of family who have resided with tenancy for past 12 months (OP is not a fammily member, nor have they lived together for past 12 months)

    Not familiar with Scottish Law, but think the Scottish secure tenacy actually makes this much easier.

    The part in English Housing - does allow a co-habitee to have the lease assigned to them - so long as they have been in the property for 1 year. ( This is from Shelter Website)...OP - may I suggest that you contact shelter for assistance.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.