We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Please Help! just made redundant with no warning!!
Comments
-
To be sacked by email is awful! and I am not sure its terribly legal either! what a dreadful shock after being on leave....
They do seem to be sweetening it up by saying they will give you 'redundancy' but you will have to weigh up whether the firm is viable enough to be sued for wrongful dismissal or whether you want to take this glowing ref they are offering and just get on with your employment life....if a reference would be more useful in securing a new position then...........but if it would be immaterial and the fees would be met by legal aid etc go see an employment lawyer!
No legal aid is available for employment issues I'm afraid.
An email can be an adequate form of communication but in this case the 'letter' doesn't specify a fair reason for dismissal so it is academic - there has been no adequate written reason for dismissal anyway.0 -
No legal aid is available for employment issues I'm afraid.
An email can be an adequate form of communication but in this case the 'letter' doesn't specify a fair reason for dismissal so it is academic - there has been no adequate written reason for dismissal anyway.
no you can't be sacked or made redundant by email
If they are sacking you they have to have acted correctly and given you warnings or go right to the last and sack you for gross misconduct in which case you are invited to a meeting and can have a union rep or a someone else from work too as a witness.
For redundany you are invited to similar meeting where they detail the redundancy and give you a letter stating thats what they are doing
In both cases you had the right to appeal
Sorry if you are sacked by email then you need to appeal NOW to the MD0 -
no you can't be sacked or made redundant by email
If they are sacking you they have to have acted correctly and given you warnings or go right to the last and sack you for gross misconduct in which case you are invited to a meeting and can have a union rep or a someone else from work too as a witness.
For redundany you are invited to similar meeting where they detail the redundancy and give you a letter stating thats what they are doing
In both cases you had the right to appeal
Sorry if you are sacked by email then you need to appeal NOW to the MD
The OP HAS been sacked by email!0 -
Not all dismisals require writen notice,
Most it is on request allthough most employers will give it in writing anyway
This is worth a good read cover a lot of the legislation(including amendments).
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/contents
section 92 covers the writen notice on termination.0 -
Just to be clear:
- The OP has been employed more than 12 months - see post 4
- There is no dooubt that this dismissal is procedurally unfair on a number of grounds - whether or not an email dismissal letter is permitted (I suggest it is) is academic against that background, it is just another reason why the dismissal may be unfair, but you only need one reason.
- You are legally entitled to written reasons for dismissal
- In this case, written reasons are academic, (although they may be of interest and of use in an ET claim), because the OP has already been sacked. Unless of course they are going to try and rescue the situation by pointing out their rights and conduct an appeal, but is that a realistic scenario in the circumstances? I would suggest not.
0 -
Apart from the complete moron who told me to move on (ugh...its been an hour)... thanks for the advice.
I know that I am being gracefully sacked... But what do I do now?! I have NEVER been unemployed.0 -
Just to be clear:
- The OP has been employed more than 12 months - see post 4
- There is no dooubt that this dismissal is procedurally unfair on a number of grounds - whether or not an email dismissal letter is permitted (I suggest it is) is academic against that background, it is just another reason why the dismissal may be unfair, but you only need one reason.
- You are legally entitled to written reasons for dismissal
- In this case, written reasons are academic, (although they may be of interest and of use in an ET claim), because the OP has already been sacked. Unless of course they are going to try and rescue the situation by pointing out their rights and conduct an appeal, but is that a realistic scenario in the circumstances? I would suggest not.
I agree with the above. If this a proper redunancy scenario, there are serious cracks in the procedure used.
If this isn't a redundancy (ie they are going to refill the role) then you have decent grounds to claim unfair dismissal.
Your choice now is to:
1) take the two weeks pay you would not ordinarily be entitled to in a redundancy situation (you have been there less than 2 years) and move on
2) Appeal the redundancy (if only for the purposes of being seen to follow process) and seek legal advice in order to push for damages relating to unfair dismissal/breach of process. Personally for the sake of risking 2 weeks pay I would consider option 2 - but that's just me.
Good luck either wayGo round the green binbags. Turn right at the mouldy George Elliot, forward, forward, and turn left....at the dead badger0 -
Where does it say she was sacked by email? the first post says their manager told them 'this morning' and then the email said 'further to our conversation.....'. The email was a follow up to the dismissal.
Personally i'd take the pay off, stay on good terms with them and seeing as it's a recruitment agency, ask them to try and find you a job. If you get a bit funny with them you're going to add to job hunting difficulties.0 -
I agree with the above. If this a proper redunancy scenario, there are serious cracks in the procedure used.
If this isn't a redundancy (ie they are going to refill the role) then you have decent grounds to claim unfair dismissal.
Your choice now is to:
1) take the two weeks pay you would not ordinarily be entitled to in a redundancy situation (you have been there less than 2 years) and move on
2) Appeal the redundancy (if only for the purposes of being seen to follow process) and seek legal advice in order to push for damages relating to unfair dismissal/breach of process. Personally for the sake of risking 2 weeks pay I would consider option 2 - but that's just me.
Good luck either way
There are 'serious cracks' whether or not it is a redundancy, and taking the two weeks pay doesn't stop them claiming unfair dismissal aswell.0 -
There are 'serious cracks' whether or not it is a redundancy, and taking the two weeks pay doesn't stop them claiming unfair dismissal aswell.
Couldn't agree more, I suspect that in the not too distant future they will have someone back in this role.
However, if she puts in an appeal or a lawyers letter they may withold the redundancy payment (unless already paid) - unlike the PILON they do not have to pay this.
Either way I would be tempted to stick in a claim. Poor behaviour by the company.Go round the green binbags. Turn right at the mouldy George Elliot, forward, forward, and turn left....at the dead badger0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards