We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
My Interest rate gamble pays off again!
Comments
-
-
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Indeed...I was asking renoman, because I'd assume that he would agree that adaptation also means selling to rent, holding out for house prices to fall, making the most of the current economy to plan to get something cheaper. Buying into shared ownership as you have to adapt your wants to fit your needs. Living with your parents for a while etc etc etc.
But he berates people who do this.
So I wasn't quite sure where he was coming from.
For someone so financially astute,why did you buy half a house?0 -
undetterred wrote: »For someone so financially astute,why did you buy half a house?
Surely, if Graham's financial circumstances dictated that he should buy "half a house" when he did, then he was being financially astute to do so.
I bought (all of) my house, but I don't class myself as being financially astute based on the fact that I did. I class myself as financially astute because I generally make decent financial decisions based on my circumstances when I make them.
We can all be astute in hindsight.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
Surely, if Graham's financial circumstances dictated that he should buy "half a house" when he did, then he was being financially astute to do so.
I bought my (all of) my house, but I don't class myself as being financially astute based on the fact that I did. I class myself as financially astute because I generally make decent financial decisions based on my circumstances when I make them.
We can all be astute in hindsight.
Agreed,
I did lots of investing post the dot com boom. Thinking that things had returned to normal, when infact it turned out to be a great investment. Even on the boring of trackers :P
Spawn can happen anywhere. It's only gamblers who confuse it with acumen.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Indeed...I was asking renoman, because I'd assume that he would agree that adaptation also means selling to rent, holding out for house prices to fall, ...
Selling to rent is a fools game - recklessly gambling your house in the hope that you can time the market.
Just look at these muppets:
http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/media/LondonTonight-2005-12-12.wmv
They must have lost an absolute fortune.0 -
Why assume property bear = pessimist and property bull = optimist?
Where is the connection?
I agree. Let's take the nonsensical 'bears' and 'bulls' out of the equation - its a meaningless name because no one is bearish or bullish about a particular market. On this board people are split by their personality traits and are pessimists or optimists.
A very few would be classed as realists; Generali and perhaps JonnyBravo to name two. However, as we saw from shortchanged's post, many people, think they are realists even though they don't consider both sides of the coin. Generali is an example of someone who posts pessimism and optimism in equal measure.
I've said many, many, many times that I think the whole 'bear' and 'bull' gang thing is ridiculous and childish, but it seems the 'bear gang' like to be in a group and continue to pigeonhole people accordingly, hence the rest of us have to use these stupid monikers.0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »I've said many, many, many times that I think the whole 'bear' and 'bull' gang thing is ridiculous and childish, but it seems the 'bear gang' like to be in a group and continue to pigeonhole people accordingly, hence the rest of us have to use these stupid monikers.
Blinkered as per usual Renoman because the so called bull gang don't act like that do they.0 -
shortchanged wrote: »Blinkered as per usual Renoman because the so called bull gang don't act like that do they.
I'd be interested in how many people would say they were 'bulls'. I know you've called me that in the past and called yourself a bear. I've never described myself as a Bull, it's ridiculous.
I'm currently indifferent about the housing market, I'm bullish about interest rates and I'm undecided about the immediate future of the stockmarket.
THAT'S the real definition of 'bear' and 'bull'. It's a state of mind at a particular point of time, not a lifetime membership of a club.0 -
undetterred wrote: »For someone so financially astute,why did you buy half a house?
As dervprof suggests....financially astute would be buying what you can afford?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards