We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Strikes to go ahead

11618202122

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    well

    the independent quotes the following figures

    all the usual caveats apply of course

    average pension for the armed forces £7,987
    average for health workers £4,087
    average for teachers £10,275
    average civil servant £5,023
    average fire service £13,193
    average for MPs £21,364


    which ones would we want to cut and by how much?
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    well

    the independent quotes the following figures

    all the usual caveats apply of course

    average pension for the armed forces £7,987
    average for health workers £4,087
    average for teachers £10,275
    average civil servant £5,023
    average fire service £13,193
    average for MPs £21,364


    which ones would we want to cut and by how much?

    The figures are meaningless unless they include length of service and amount of contributions.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    beecher2 wrote: »
    I think it is from the TUC's 'Work your Proper Hours Day' stats, though it is from 2010
    http://www.tuc.org.uk/workplace/tuc-17614-f0.cfm

    The part of that data I found odd was that 46.1% of teachers do not do any overtime at all.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    The figures are meaningless unless they include length of service and amount of contributions.


    as I said, they include all the usual caveats

    however the debate seems to be partly about 'sustainability' and can we 'afford it' and partly about 'fairness'.

    the 'burden ' on the taxpayers doesn't look too outrageous although the matter of fairness still stands of course.
  • beecher2
    beecher2 Posts: 3,677 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Really2 wrote: »
    The part of that data I found odd was that 46.1% of teachers do not do any overtime at all.

    They're the honest ones who might do 2 hours worth of work in the evening. In the schools I've worked in, some try to out do each other with outrageous stories of how hard they work, and how they are up until 3 am working. It is a mangement issue really.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 June 2011 at 11:53AM
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    as I said, they include all the usual caveats

    however the debate seems to be partly about 'sustainability' and can we 'afford it' and partly about 'fairness'.

    the 'burden ' on the taxpayers doesn't look too outrageous although the matter of fairness still stands of course.

    Well the numbers employed are the major factor not necessarily the amounts.
    Even if you got rid of MP's pensions completely and distributed the cash to all the others in the public sector what kind of impact would it make?
    I make it about £2.20 for everyone in the public sector.

    So the argument for change is a good one, the amount of difference it will make is minute.
  • lostinrates
    lostinrates Posts: 55,283 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    edited 30 June 2011 at 12:16PM
    FTBFun wrote: »
    I somehow doubt this is accurate. Workers in City law firms and banks are renowned for working incredibly high amounts of overtime.

    A friend of mine worked for 9 months in an investment bank before he quit, and despite being contracted the usual 35/40 hours a week, he generally worked - as a minimum - 8am to 2am every weekday, and sometimes on weekends. This is pretty much par for the course in that sector.

    BTW I'm aware of the whole bonus thing, but this isn't necessarily based upon the actual hours spent working.


    City law firm bonuses are not quite the same as City Bankers'.

    But yes, the hours are long and unpredictable. Unlike our teacher friends who might know they have x club or a timetable for the term ahead for some planning DH gets little notice. Longs days are the norm, but tbf, often they can get in a little later if they stay a little later, workload and firm permitting. They work in international areana, so can be on call 24 hours a day, when they are the mid point between a deal that spans, say, Japan to NYC..the working day starts before breakfast and ends...well, it depends The main benefit of a teachers timetable over a city workers one, IMO, is the relative predictability. However, this is a life choice made on balance of other things. If, for example, pay changed I do think he'd review priorities. I do not think he'd get far though! (of course post criunch thats exactly what happened, conditions changed, pay conditions also changed to reflect that)

    It seems to me there is scope for conditions of work improvnment for many...but I am a bit uneasy about the word ''fair'' being used atm by everyone: I'm not sure any result is ''fair'' to everyone.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Looks like the Govt have mobilised the full force of the Tory press today :)

    Just one question, if only around 34% of private sector employees are in a workplace pension and obviously some (but I wouldn't have thought many) would have a private pension, the balance are obviously going to be fully funded out of the public purse. What is the difference if it comes as a public sector pension or a state handout?
    Government figures show in the private sector, 39% of male employees and 28% of female employees belonged to a workplace pension scheme in 2010.
    In the public sector, male employee membership of workplace pension schemes was 87% while female employee membership stood at 82%

    http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/Public-Vs-Private-Who-Gets-skynews-3684708969.html?x=0
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 June 2011 at 1:08PM
    StevieJ wrote: »
    What is the difference if it comes as a public sector pension or a state handout?


    http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/Public-Vs-Private-Who-Gets-skynews-3684708969.html?x=0

    Someone in the private sector will pay for both of them but only claim one.
    Someone in the public sector pays for both and can claim both.

    I don't think anyone is making out the people on pension credit (less than £7142 per year pension) are well off or costs more per head of workforce when compared to public sector pensions.
    around 2.7M get pension credit, there are over 6m in the public sector.

    The average cost of pension credit is around £1470 per claimant PA or £0.00007p PA per UK worker.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Really2 wrote: »
    Someone in the private sector will pay for both of them but only claim one.
    Someone in the public sector pays for both and can claim both.

    I don't think anyone is making out the people on pension credit (less than £7142 per year pension) are well off or costs more per head of workforce when compared to public sector pensions.
    around 2.7M get pension credit, there are over 6m in the public sector.

    The average cost of pension credit is around £1470 per claimant PA or £0.00007p PA per UK worker.

    Does that include their rent and rates?
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.