MSE News: Only one third of pupils understand the new tuition fees system
Options
Comments
-
Ok, who had bankers at post 89 in the sweepstake?
I've yet to see an argument against the fees where the banks haven't bring brought into it.0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »I really cannot see how someone earning £30,000 ( as an example) is going to be having difficulty in making repayments of less than £70 pcm. By the time the repayments go to over £100pcm, the graduate would need to be earning over £35,000 and well able to afford this as well as a season ticket. You'd need to be in the higher rate tax bracket before your student loan repayments cost you more than an average pub lunch for 2!
I have already starting budgeting for when I start.
On £33k, my take home after student loan repayments (remember, my threshold is £15k, not the higher £21k! Nor does my threshold rise over time), and after 8% pension contributions will be £1,907
My season ticket (which will be zones 1-2, High Wycombe -> Marylebone will cost £380. Car parking will be £100. So that means after travel my take home will be £1,427.
Oh how on earth can I live off that?0 -
-
there's still no news on whether early repayments will be allowed (bad move).
Please clarify.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
(remember, my threshold is £15k, not the higher £21k! Nor does my threshold rise over time)
The only place I can find that confirmed (haven't looked very hard though) is here:
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/higher-education/students/student-finance/myth-buster
For some reason it is archived! As far as I know it's still the case though.0 -
gadgetmind wrote: »Please clarify.
Unless I missed it (and Martin's FAQ from 14th June still has it as under debate - point 15), the government hasn't confirmed;
a) whether overpayments will be allowed
b) what, if any, penalty might apply for paying off the loan early
Naturally, if higher earners are able to make overpayments against the loan it would be possible to pay back less overall by making the interest payments smaller.
This is great at an individual level, but not if the intention behind the system was to ensure higher earners pay substantially more, so that they subsidise lower earners directly.
I don't know if this is the explicit idea, but if it was then allowing overpayments wrecks the concept, because you give individuals the chance to reduce their overall contribution by overpaying - and higher earners are more likely to have the spare money and clear incentive to do this.
It wouldn't surprise me if this is one of the reasons that there has been no clear answer...0 -
Taiko wrote:Ok, who had bankers at post 89 in the sweepstake?
I've yet to see an argument against the fees where the banks haven't bring brought into it.
Ever played chess?0 -
And how exactly does that relate to the issue of tuition fees...0
-
My season ticket (which will be zones 1-2, High Wycombe -> Marylebone will cost £380. Car parking will be £100. So that means after travel my take home will be £1,427.
Oh how on earth can I live off that?
don't envy that commute long term though.... it's long!:happyhear0 -
Unless I missed it (and Martin's FAQ from 14th June still has it as under debate - point 15), the government hasn't confirmed;
a) whether overpayments will be allowed
Yes, that's how I see it.Naturally, if higher earners are able to make overpayments against the loan it would be possible to pay back less overall by making the interest payments smaller.
This is great at an individual level, but not if the intention behind the system was to ensure higher earners pay substantially more, so that they subsidise lower earners directly.
But isn't the whole MSE spirit about individuals taking control of their spending, minimising unnecessary expense, and striving to be debt free? And this isn't just a "higher earner" thing, it applies to anyone who's prepared to dig a bit deeper, forgo a few luxuries, and so reduce their debt burden.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.9K Spending & Discounts
- 235.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.3K Life & Family
- 248.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards