We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Brighthouse family harassment
Options
Comments
-
It's information people are looking for, not more questionsThen I suggest that posters restrict themselves to that specific activity, rather than making unwelcome moral judgements.
Talk about being hypocritical.
On more than one occasion you were specifically asked if you could provide a link to provide information to back up a claim you made, and on every occasion you failed to do so, instead choosing to make comments such as this one.Because I am not here to educate you. I have pointed you in the general direction; I hear google is a wonderful learning tool.
What is the point in doing as you say and advising that posters "restrict themselves to that specific activity", when some of the people who claim that they have the information asked for refuse to divulge it, and simply claim that it is available using Google?0 -
My guess would be that this information was offered up by a relative who was called. "do you have any alternative contact details for mr. X?" "yes, try his mother/brother/uncle/aunts house on 01234567890, he is there a lot"
Also, Flyboy, if the OP was asked for people the company could contact in this situation (which he would be) and he freely offered this information after being informed of why those details would be taken and how they would be used (as he would be) then he really has no comeback. Brighthouse made it perfectly clear to me that if they Repeatedly could not get hold of me, then they would use the contact details on the reference form to try and get hold of me. As I had every intention of paying on time every week, or contacting them first in any instance where I couldn't pay, I had no issue with this.0 -
The fact that they have been calling these "references" to ask where their customer is. Now, that will give you a clue, if it doesn't, it is not my fault you don't understand it.
The legal definition of harassment is: behaviour likely to cause alarm and distress.
Well actually, it would be any course of action which a reasonable person would consider to be harassment.
Please note the words "course of action" i.e. not one incident and also that wonderful word reasonable.."The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."
Bertrand Russell. British author, mathematician, & philosopher (1872 - 1970)0 -
The legal definition of harassment is: behaviour likely to cause alarm and distress
Not quite correct.
The actual law states that alarm or distress must be caused for it to be classed as harassment. The word "likely" is just something that you slipped in there (unintentionally I'm sure)
Protection from Harassment Act 1997(3)For the purposes of this section—
“conduct” includes speech;
“harassment” of a person includes causing the person alarm or distress; and“harassment” of a person includes causing the person alarm or distress; and
a course of conduct must involve conduct on at least two occasions.
(4)It shall be a defence to any action of harassment to show that the course of conduct complained of—
(a)was authorised by, under or by virtue of any enactment or rule of law;
(b)was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime; or
(c)was, in the particular circumstances, reasonable.
There is a charge of using threatening behaviour likely to cause alarm and distress, but this is an entirely different charge to one of harassment.0 -
-
If, as the BH website suggests they are to be references only, and Brighthouse are retaining the data to find out where the customer is in the event of a missed payment then they have breached the DPA.
How does this help the OP?
They can point out to BH that they do not have permission to contact the persons given for character references to discuss their finances.0 -
Just because brighthouse describe them as 'personal references' doesn't mean there isn't a clause in the contract op agreed to stating they can contact the names provides in such cases.
Is anybody with brighthouse here and do you have a contract at hand?0 -
mynameisdave wrote: »If, as the BH website suggests they are to be references only, and Brighthouse are retaining the data to find out where the customer is in the event of a missed payment then they have breached the DPA.
How does this help the OP?
They can point out to BH that they do not have permission to contact the persons given for character references to discuss their finances.
I would imagine the information is more detailed within the T's and C's, but without knowing exactly what the OP signed, all the advice given is speculative.0 -
Ignoring the 6 pages of arguing, and getting back to the OP.
If you don't want them to contact other people, don't give them any contact details for other people and sign an agreement presumably saying they can.
If you don't want them to contact other people, don't miss any payments.
The OP doesn't contact a single question relating to consumer rights, the only question in it is "anyone else annoyed at brighthouse for their tactics on chasing money from their customers" and the fact the question mark is missing suggests this was rhetorical anyway.
Does someone want to come along and move this to the "vent" board instead, as that is all it is?"We can all fly as high as the dreams we dare to live...........unless we are a chicken" ~ Anon.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards