PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Gas Safety Inspection - Not performed correctly?

13»

Comments

  • rdr
    rdr Posts: 414 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    The gas safety check requires the whole length of the flue to be inspected, to do this you must see it. If he didn't go into the loft he hasn't done the test - you are not protected and he is breaking the law.
    If you are sure he didn't go there report him to gassafe and the HSE.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,746 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    rdr wrote: »
    The gas safety check requires the whole length of the flue to be inspected, to do this you must see it. If he didn't go into the loft he hasn't done the test - you are not protected and he is breaking the law.
    If you are sure he didn't go there report him to gassafe and the HSE.

    Who is breaking the law? The gasman or the landlord. Certainly the landlord has fulfilled his legal obligations by paying for and ensuring that a gas safety certificate is issued. The gasman is cutting corners and should be pulled up on it.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Mouseman
    Mouseman Posts: 2,394 Forumite
    "If he didn't go into the loft he hasn't done the test - you are not protected and he is breaking the law."

    Seems fairly clear that that sentence is damning the gas engineer? The subject remains the same.
    If this post wasn't up to your standards, please lower your standards... ;)
  • prudryden
    prudryden Posts: 2,075 Forumite
    If you are going to file a negligence report be sure to protect yourself. Get signed affidavits with witnesses from your OH and his relatives. You don't want to be paying the inspector's loss income for the rest of your life.
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
  • rdr
    rdr Posts: 414 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    silvercar wrote: »
    Who is breaking the law? The gasman or the landlord. Certainly the landlord has fulfilled his legal obligations by paying for and ensuring that a gas safety certificate is issued. The gasman is cutting corners and should be pulled up on it.

    The gasman has broken the law if he has issued the certificate without doing a proper check.
    The landlord will be breaking the law if he lets the house without a valid LGSC, so tell him what has happened and it is his responsibility to sort it out. The gasman's contract is with him not you.
  • prudryden
    prudryden Posts: 2,075 Forumite
    The landlord has a valid LGSR (not LGSC) if it is signed, dated and has the inspector's REG no. You can tell the LL, but he will just ask for proof. The OP can only pass on hearsay information. Not worth a lot unfortunately.
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
  • rdr
    rdr Posts: 414 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    prudryden wrote: »
    The landlord has a valid LGSR (not LGSC) if it is signed, dated and has the inspector's REG no. You can tell the LL, but he will just ask for proof. The OP can only pass on hearsay information. Not worth a lot unfortunately.

    Regulation 36 of the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998 imposes three destinct, but linked obigations on the landlord:
    (2) Every landlord shall ensure that there is maintained in safe condition -
    (a) any relevant gas fitting; and
    (b) any flue which serves any relevant gas fitting,
    so as to prevent the risk of injury to any person in lawful occupation of relevant premises.
    (3) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph 2 above, a landlord
    shall -
    (a) ensure that each appliance and flue to which that duty extends is checked for safety within 12 months of being installed and at intervals of not more than 12 months since it was last checked for safety (whether such check was made pursuant to these Regulations or not);
    (b)...
    (c) ensure that a record in respect of any appliance or flue so checked is made and retained for a period of 2 years from the date of that check, which record shall include the following information -
    from HSE
    possession of the certificate alone is not enough, it is not impossible that you get this off your mate the plumber for a nominal charge and no work. It may well be that the landlord has acted in good faith, but if the test was not done properly he has not fulfilled his duty.
    An HSE inspector investigating this could easily take a statement from the people present as saying that the gas man did not go into the loft -- this would not be hearsay.
    Had the landlord unwittingly been ripped off by the gas man it is unlikely he would be prosecuted, however, if it were shown he colluded in the visit to solely to issue a certificate with no intention of doing the work and profited from it he would be hung out to dry.
    If the test was not done properly the certificate is worthless and it is a landlord's responsibility to get the test done properly.
    You should raise your concerns with him and then it is his duty to investigate and remedy the problem.
  • prudryden
    prudryden Posts: 2,075 Forumite
    rdr wrote: »
    Regulation 36 of the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998 imposes three destinct, but linked obigations on the landlord:

    from HSE
    possession of the certificate alone is not enough, it is not impossible that you get this off your mate the plumber for a nominal charge and no work. It may well be that the landlord has acted in good faith, but if the test was not done properly he has not fulfilled his duty.
    An HSE inspector investigating this could easily take a statement from the people present as saying that the gas man did not go into the loft -- this would not be hearsay.
    Had the landlord unwittingly been ripped off by the gas man it is unlikely he would be prosecuted, however, if it were shown he colluded in the visit to solely to issue a certificate with no intention of doing the work and profited from it he would be hung out to dry.
    If the test was not done properly the certificate is worthless and it is a landlord's responsibility to get the test done properly.
    You should raise your concerns with him and then it is his duty to investigate and remedy the problem.

    That has got to be the most idiotic statement of all time.;
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
  • sonastin
    sonastin Posts: 3,210 Forumite
    prudryden wrote: »
    That has got to be the most idiotic statement of all time.;

    care to explain why? it doesn't look remotely idiotic to me. I am open to being educated about what is wrong with the statement...
  • rdr
    rdr Posts: 414 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    sonastin wrote: »
    care to explain why? it doesn't look remotely idiotic to me. I am open to being educated about what is wrong with the statement...


    Still waiting
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.