We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Upgrading RAM
Options
Comments
-
KillerWatt wrote: »I was under the impression this was a money saving site, and as the OP won't see a blind bit of difference by adding extra RAM then it's simply a waste of money.
I have to disagree - more RAM is usually one of the best upgrades you can do especially if you run a lot of programmes simultaneously or if you leave more than one user logged on.0 -
Wouldn't the main problem with a 3-year-old laptop be the processor speed? What processor has it got and how many points does it have on https://www.cpubenchmark.net?0
-
thescouselander wrote: »I have to disagree - more RAM is usually one of the best upgrades you can do especially if you run a lot of programmes simultaneously or if you leave more than one user logged on.Remember kids, it's the volts that jolt and the mills that kill.0
-
post a hijackthis log
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2436849
rather than combine the 2 partitions, you could just move your data from c to d!!
> . !!!! ----> .0 -
Surely, even if they are not going to be using the full 4 gig, if they currently have a 2 gig simm in, and put another identical one in, then it will be operating in dual channel mode which would give some (albiet minor usually) speed improvement, regardless of how much of the ram is actually used.
Of course, speedwise, it could be cheaper to look at a better processor.[greenhighlight]but it matters when the most senior politician in the land is happy to use language and examples that are simply not true.
[/greenhighlight][redtitle]
The impact of this is to stigmatise people on benefits,
and we should be deeply worried about that[/redtitle](house of lords debate, talking about Cameron)0 -
KillerWatt wrote: »That's all well & good if the OS and installed applications are going to take advantage of it, right now the OP is just about hitting 50% of the 2GB he or she has installed.
Thats not really a good indicator - its better to look at the page file usage. Windows will likely use the page file less if there's more RAM which will give better performance.0 -
MarkBargain wrote: »Wouldn't the main problem with a 3-year-old laptop be the processor speed? [/url]
No. Any CPU made in the last 3 years other than asthmatic netbook ones is sufficient.0 -
The OP's problem is surely not 2GB of RAM, but a C partition that is 95% full.
You need more like 15% free space to make that machine run smoothly, so removal of data and/or programs should be the first step.No free lunch, and no free laptop0 -
The OP's problem is surely not 2GB of RAM, but a C partition that is 95% full.
You need more like 15% free space to make that machine run smoothly, so removal of data and/or programs should be the first step.
Thanks for the advice. I will get the partition sorted and see if it makes a difference before getting a RAM ugrade.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards