Ryan Giggs, football money and the effect on the economy

adouglasmhor

debtistheft wrote: »

Of course poor people behave impeccably and that is the reason why we don't see their antics spread across the newspapers.

You obviously don't read the Mail then do you :rotfl::rotfl:

[Deleted User]

Thrugelmir wrote: »

In the majority of cases where the individual is married. These injunctions are being granted by the court on the grounds of protecting the children of the individual.

He should have thought of them before he did it.

I'd rather we didn't have our judiciary helping to cover up the sleazy nature of the likes of Goodwin under a somewhat stretched interpretation of their human rights.

debtistheft

Why do you care about the infidelity of a stranger?

"If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." John 8:7

[Deleted User]

debtistheft wrote: »

Why do you care about the infidelity of a stranger?

"If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." John 8:7

I don't in the case of Giggs, however with Sir Goodwin it is a different matter. This is a guy who's mismanagement of RBS has burdened us all with massive debts. I think it is only fair that we find out that this guy was repeatedly promoting his mistress while he oversaw the disaster he created for his company, shareholders and the country.

The fact that these people appear to be able to abuse the intent of laws such as the human rights bill in this way is a much bigger scandal than any of the individual cases.

debtistheft

Perhaps if the newspapers only published information that really was in the public interest then these laws would not be needed.

adouglasmhor

debtistheft wrote: »

Why do you care about the infidelity of a stranger?

"If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." John 8:7

Because some of our kids look up to people like that and we want them to see the consequences of such behavior.

debtistheft

adouglasmhor wrote: »

Because some of our kids look up to people like that and we want them to see the consequences of such behavior.

Perhaps we should make sure our kids look up to their parents than to strangers they see on TV.

adouglasmhor

Why it is part of the learning process for many kids, if they are good examples it undoes some of the mistakes we parents make and if they prove to be bad ones then it shows there are consequences for bad decisions for everybody and anybody?

bendix

[quote=[Deleted User];43886162]I don't in the case of Giggs, however with Sir Goodwin it is a different matter. This is a guy who's mismanagement of RBS has burdened us all with massive debts. I think it is only fair that we find out that this guy was repeatedly promoting his mistress while he oversaw the disaster he created for his company, shareholders and the country.

The fact that these people appear to be able to abuse the intent of laws such as the human rights bill in this way is a much bigger scandal than any of the individual cases.[/QUOTE]


Wardy, old chap. Let it go. I very much doubt that Goodwin was personally responsible refusing you your property loan in 2008.

No offence, but you strike me as having a nebulous grasp on reality.

StevieJ

[quote=[Deleted User];43868646]So your idea is that there was nothing to hide he just did it out of his desire to help those hard up solicitors. Bless him.

I'm glad we have the benefit of your insight Thrugelmir, otherwise we'd have all assumed he was hiding the fact that he's a sleaze and not worthy of his title.[/QUOTE]

Maybe he is trying to protect his kids ( you must know what bullies can be like in the playground ) OK yes he could have protected them by having no human frailties ya de ya. It seems to me it is the kids who suffer most in things like this but nobody seems to give a toss, how many times have you heard the kids position put forward in all the holier-than-thou crap spouted on the interweb?