Ryan Giggs, football money and the effect on the economy

[Deleted User]

StevieJ wrote: »

Maybe he is trying to protect his kids ( you must know what bullies can be like in the playground ) OK yes he could have protected them by having no human frailties ya de ya. It seems to me it is the kids who suffer most in things like this but nobody seems to give a toss, how many times have you heard the kids position put forward in all the holier-than-thou crap spouted on the interweb?

If the kids are victims it is his fault. Given the many things this guy was already publicly known to have done wrong its hard to see that would make any difference.

StevieJ

[quote=[Deleted User];43887512]If the kids are victims it is his fault. Given the many things this guy was already publicly known to have done wrong its hard to see that would make any difference.[/QUOTE]

It is his fault trying to protect them? BTW could you enlighten me on 'the many things' Giggs has publicly known to have done wrong because it has not publicly reached me yet.

debtistheft

[quote=[Deleted User];43887512]If the kids are victims it is his fault. Given the many things this guy was already publicly known to have done wrong its hard to see that would make any difference.[/QUOTE]

I very much doubt that you live in a monestary and live a clean and simple life untroubled by the sins of the world. The difference is that any of your indiscretions are ignored because you are a nobody, just like us.

Perhaps you ned to look inside yourself and ask why you really feel so upset about this famous millionaire's affaire with a very attractive woman? I doubt its based on moral outrage.

adouglasmhor

debtistheft wrote: »

I very much doubt that you live in a monestary and live a clean and simple life untroubled by the sins of the world. The difference is that any of your indiscretions are ignored because you are a nobody, just like us.

Perhaps you ned to look inside yourself and ask why you really feel so upset about this famous millionaire's affaire with a very attractive woman? I doubt its based on moral outrage.

I see what you are getting at, but I think the thing you need to understand is - not everyone is as superficial as you seem to be.
People are miffed because he and others have tried to buy their way out of the consequences of their actions.

StevieJ

adouglasmhor wrote: »

I see what you are getting at, but I think the thing you need to understand is - not everyone is as superficial as you seem to be.
People are miffed because he and others have tried to buy their way out of the consequences of their actions.

If that was true, all the other injunctees would be named in paliament and Twitter. BTW would the results of your transgressions be front page of the Daily Mail?

adouglasmhor

StevieJ wrote: »

If that was true, all the other injunctees would be named in paliament and Twitter. BTW would the results of your transgressions be front page of the Daily Mail?

No because I an not a public figure. I made the centre pages of the Telegraph and the Express once and have been on the news a couple of times as well. But anyone who didn't know me would never have a clue who i was.

[Deleted User]

StevieJ wrote: »

It is his fault trying to protect them? BTW could you enlighten me on 'the many things' Giggs has publicly known to have done wrong because it has not publicly reached me yet.

I was talking about Goodwin, I'm not all that bothered about Giggs.

[Deleted User]

debtistheft wrote: »

I very much doubt that you live in a monestary and live a clean and simple life untroubled by the sins of the world. The difference is that any of your indiscretions are ignored because you are a nobody, just like us.

Perhaps you ned to look inside yourself and ask why you really feel so upset about this famous millionaire's affaire with a very attractive woman? I doubt its based on moral outrage.

If you read my posts I was referring to Goodwin. My own failings have not hurt anything like as many people as Goodwin's.

bendix

[quote=[Deleted User];43889708]If you read my posts I was referring to Goodwin. My own failings have not hurt anything like as many people as Goodwin's.[/QUOTE]

Again, let it go. Shhhhhhhh, calm down. Think nice things.

You really need to let go of your hatred of banks and bankers, and not take it personally they refused you a loan.

It makes you come across as so full of bile and hatred.

[Deleted User]

bendix wrote: »

Again, let it go. Shhhhhhhh, calm down. Think nice things.

You really need to let go of your hatred of banks and bankers, and not take it personally they refused you a loan.

It makes you come across as so full of bile and hatred.

I don't resent them for refusing me a loan when I had the money to buy the property outright and did so.

I merely used it as an example of how the bank's claims to be willing to lend to small businesses is a lie on another thread

Before you further try to discredit me, as stated on the other thread I have no bad debts, no defaults, and good cashflow, both at the time and now.

That you try to misrepresent this and do it across other threads says a lot about you not me.

I not full of hatred but I have a growing amount of hatred for the banks and the bankers. Nobody who knows what they have done and isn't one of their biased supporters, such as yourself, could think well of them.