We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House Price Crash 5
Comments
-
Dunno - the last one had some interesting stuff on stats and probability...Gorgeous_George wrote:These threads are still boring though.0 -
Indeed it did, Actually learnt something of interest on that thread....0
-
Agree with you Alan. Ive participated in more of these threads than I care to remember. As the Why dont you kids said "do something less boring instead!":beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
Alan_M wrote:Statistics are baseless unless you're are provided with information on how the statistics are compiled, in so much as taking a poll on a website such as Housepricecrash.co.uk on whether there will be a crash in the near future or not, will still provide valid statistics but the sample group isn't exactly what you'd call representative. However as a statement of statistics they are completely valid.
How can statistics be "valid" if the sample group is far from being representative?0 -
sm9ai wrote:It is very bizarre isn't it. They really do defy logic.
Prices HAVE to crash (or drop, but the way people go on any drop is a crash). There will become a time when no-one can afford.
True. House prices are a bubble. The pressure will have to be released at some time. The problem is in predicting how and when it will happen.0 -
Becasue they are as valid as a stand alone set of statistics, that's the very point I'm making, statistics don't have to be based on even reasonable compilations, they can be compiled from anything you want, they are still valid as statistics. Utterly meaningless but valid none the less.
Historically government average house price statistics for the past two decades have not included repossesed properties taken to auction, or properties where the negative equity reached such a level that the keys were handed back and the debt wriiten off, as in neither of these cases there was actually a house sale in the traditional sense.
Therefore if you look back at the factual government statistics , there was in fact no crash in the early 90's it must have been a figment of our imagination.
Now obviously we know different, and knowing that doesn't make the statistics any less valid, even if they are utterly useless in the form they are produced.0 -
RHemmings wrote:sm9ai wrote:It is very bizarre isn't it. They really do defy logic.
Prices HAVE to crash (or drop, but the way people go on any drop is a crash). There will become a time when no-one can afford.
True. House prices are a bubble. The pressure will have to be released at some time. The problem is in predicting how and when it will happen.
Whilst it is true property prices will eventually stop rising, they do not necessarily have to crash, they just could have a period of zero prices rises. In addition, I have yet to see any evidence that property prices are forming a bubble: just because people here believe that they are doesn’t mean that a bubble is/has formed.0 -
Hereward wrote:Whilst it is true property prices will eventually stop rising, they do not necessarily have to crash, they just could have a period of zero prices rises. In addition, I have yet to see any evidence that property prices are forming a bubble: just because people here believe that they are doesn’t mean that a bubble is/has formed.
They could do, but that would require severe wage inflation.
But using very rough figures.
If you assume at the moment that nobody below 30 buys houses anymore when say 5 years ago lots did.
Well fast forward 10 years of more price rises and nobody below 40 can afford to buy a house.
Well due to the 25 year mortgage you really can't buy after 40 anyway(again there are exceptions but for the majority...). So suddenly no normal person will ever be able to buy.0 -
Well due to the 25 year mortgage you really can't buy after 40 anyway(again there are exceptions but for the majority...). So suddenly no normal person will ever be able to buy.
And not many people will be able to sell either, unless of course they drop the prices....
Im sure we have been here before tho!:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
sm9ai wrote:Well fast forward 10 years of more price rises and nobody below 40 can afford to buy a house.
...except, they may have large inheritances from people who had houses. Now they have their inheritance AND their salary to throw at the housing market.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
